How is charlo ranked #3 by the ring? propaganda?

[daggum]

back in 2016, when it looked like Golovkin was going to fight Heiland...

... you muppets insisted that he was a suitable opponent...

https://www.boxingscene.com/heiland-deserves-shot-gennady-golovkin-says-wbc-prez--109851

how is Heiland a suitable opponent for Hypekin, but not for Charlo... ?

when did ggg fight heiland? must have missed that one. you think beating heiland is good enough to get a top 5 ranking? why? if ggg had fought him it would have been one of his worst fights but its charlo's best lol. magical flip floppng standards for you

[AKAcronym]

Golovkin ended up fighting Jacobs so who gives a **** about a fight that never actually happened. Charlo fought him and is still yet to do anything meaningful at 160, unless you count getting a fortunate win against Korobov, who he won't give a rematch to. Hmmm...rematch, why does that word only get thrown around when it's about a certain fighter?

[daggum]

imagine how racist u have to be trying to compare szmitlimelta to charlo to protect ggg

whoa there you just took the thread in a strange direction.who has charlo beaten at 160? thats the question. there is some guy on here who works at mcdonalds claming conspiracy theories about how the ring is ranking ggg opponents just to make him look better so i'd like to start my own conspiracy theory. how did charlo get ranked so high? for example charlo is ranked above murata who has beaten 2 top 10 ranked guys to charlos zero. let me guess why...racism!

[Rip Chudd]

Are you surprised? It's the ring after all

[daggum]

Are you surprised? It's the ring after all

no im not surprised just like im not surprised szeremata is ranked in the top 10. its not that hard to get in the top 10. all you need is a little hype and a mediocre record as charlo and szeremata prove. which makes it so strange when guys like tank and charlo never even fight guys good enough to be perceived to be top 10 fighters.

[just the facts]

He's beaten no one ranked in their top ten and most people had him losing to korobov. Really pathetic stuff and its clear propaganda. The media continues to work overtime to prop up charlo

No one without an agenda (this leaves you out) had Korobov beating Charlo. Korobov did well and much better than expected but he didn't win.

If Charlo shouldn't be ranked third, who should?

[STREET CLEANER]

He's beaten no one ranked in their top ten and most people had him losing to korobov. Really pathetic stuff and its clear propaganda. The media continues to work overtime to prop up charlo

His resume at MW is weak. The division is weak except for GGG and Canelo but he is moving up.

Lets see you list at MW.

[daggum]

No one without an agenda (this leaves you out) had Korobov beating Charlo. Korobov did well and much better than expected but he didn't win.

If Charlo shouldn't be ranked third, who should?

i guess a lot of people have agendas out there then. always gotta love the everyone who thinks different than me must be biased but im not argument.

i think szeremata should be third

[daggum]

His resume at MW is weak. The division is weak except for GGG and Canelo but he is moving up.

Lets see you list at MW.

i dont have my own list but it would seem to make more sense to have proven guys like murata and dervey above charlo but maybe they just like to move guys who havent lost up the rankings in hopes that will help them get fights?

[just the facts]

i guess a lot of people have agendas out there then. always gotta love the everyone who thinks different than me must be biased but im not argument.

i think szeremata should be third

Based on what exactly?

It's hilarious, you go on an agenda driven rant about Charlo not fighting anyone worthy enough to be ranked third but the guy you think should be third doesn't come anywhere close to having the resume Charlo does. Is this a skin pigmentation choice for you?

I could see small arguments made for Andrade, Derv or even Jacobs.