How is Szeremeta the #6 ranked middleweight according to the ring? Propaganda???

[ShaneMosleySr]

I understand why they never named GGG as middleweight champion.

What you don’t seem to understand is that they didn’t do it because they’re not biased towards him.

If they were biased towards GGG, they would have named him champion.

Your whole point is undone by the fact that they were one of a very few select rankings that didn’t name GGG champ.

Dude you are an idiot who doesn't understand that the middleweight division is between 154-160.
Canelo was the middleweight champ because he beat Cotto when Cotto was #1 guy at middleweight. GGG has never beaten the top guy at middleweight so idk what you're trying to argue. GGG could've never been recognized as the ring champion for that very reason.

Smarten up, you're so emotional you're making ****** mistakes

[mcdonalds]

I understand why they never named GGG as middleweight champion.

What you don’t seem to understand is that they didn’t do it because they’re not biased towards him.

If they were biased towards GGG, they would have named him champion.

Your whole point is undone by the fact that they were one of a very few select rankings that didn’t name GGG champ.

They didn't do it because GGG didn't beat the top guy. It would've been IMPOSSIBLE for them to rank ggg as their champion no matter how biased they are in favor of GGG.

Get that through your thick fcking skull, Jesus Christ

[ShaneMosleySr]

So you’re just going to ignore the fact that half of the boxers ranked in the top 10 in every weight class haven’t fought anyone to justify being ranked.

Nice way to avoid objectivity.

The fck is the EBU? The Euro Bum Union?

Who has he been in the ring with to justify being a borderline top 5 middleweight?

[ShaneMosleySr]

BECAUSE THEY AREN’T BIASED TOWARDS GGG!!!

They would have just named him champion if they were biased!

Remember when Bernard Hopkins retained his 175 pound Ring Magazine title after getting knocked out because De La Hoya didn’t agree with the referee? That’s being biased towards a house fighter.

Ranking GGG number one, or in a p4p list or ranking his next opponent is not being biased towards him.

They didn't do it because GGG didn't beat the top guy. It would've been IMPOSSIBLE for them to rank gggsd their champion no matter how biased they are in favor of GGG.

Get that through your thick fcking skull, Jesus Christ

[mcdonalds]

So you’re just going to ignore the fact that half of the boxers ranked in the top 10 in every weight class haven’t fought anyone to justify being ranked.

Nice way to avoid objectivity.

Why are you ducking the question?

Who has he been in the ring with to justify being a borderline top 5 middleweight?

[mcdonalds]

BECAUSE THEY AREN’T BIASED TOWARDS GGG!!!

They would have just named him champion if they were biased!

Remember when Bernard Hopkins retained his 175 pound Ring Magazine title after getting knocked out because De La Hoya didn’t agree with the referee? That’s being biased towards a house fighter.

Ranking GGG number one, or in a p4p list or ranking his next opponent is not being biased towards him.

You still can't comprehend the fact it would've been impossible for them to ever rank him as their champion. Sad

Oh and hopkins didn't lose the ring title because the fight was later ruled a NC. Checkmate

[ShaneMosleySr]

I answered the question.

Being in the ring with someone McDonald’s appreciates isn’t how you determine an objective ranking service determines top 10 fighter.

You’re pretending like he’s the only ranked fighter who hasn’t beaten a name you recognize or like.

I’m telling you that out of 170 ranked fighters, at least 100 of them haven’t done enough to prove themselves to your standards.

Szeremeta is undefeated, he’s an EBU champion and he’s beaten fringe contenders.

That’s more than enough to be ranked number 6 or 7.

You’re picking on him because he’s GGG’s next opponent.

If you didn’t hate GGG, you would start a thread about why Kudratillo Abdukakhorov is ranked at welterweight or why
Devin Haney is ranked number four at lightweight etc.

Why are you ducking the question?

Who has he been in the ring with to justify being a borderline top 5 middleweight?

[mcdonalds]

I answered the question.

Being in the ring with someone McDonald’s appreciates isn’t how you determine an objective ranking service determines top 10 fighter.

You’re pretending like he’s the only ranked fighter who hasn’t beaten a name you recognize or like.

I’m telling you that out of 170 ranked fighters, at least 100 of them haven’t done enough to prove themselves to your standards.

Szeremeta is undefeated, he’s an EBU champion and he’s beaten fringe contenders.

That’s more than enough to be ranked number 6 or 7.

You’re picking on him because he’s GGG’s next opponent.

If you didn’t hate GGG, you would start a thread about why Kudratillo Abdukakhorov is ranked at welterweight or why
Devin Haney is ranked number four at lightweight etc.

You're still ducking the question

Stick to the topic, who has he been in the ring with to justify being #6?

[ShaneMosleySr]

If they were biased towards GGG, they would have found a way to name him champion.

You claimed they’re biased for him. Them not breaking their own rules to benefit GGG is evidence against your position.

The Hopkins-Dawson fight was ruled a no contest well after the fact. The contest was officially ruled a knockout win in favor of Dawson and Ring magazine refused to name Dawson as champion. That’s being biased and it was because Hopkins was a GBP fighter.

You still can't comprehend the fact it would've been impossible for them to ever rank him as their champion. Sad

Oh and hopkins didn't lose the ring title because the fight was later ruled a NC. Checkmate

[famicommander]

#6 Ring
#7 TBRB
#3 WBC
#3 IBF
#9 WBO
#9 IBO

Consensus top 10.