Comments Thread For: Wilder Taking Step-Aside Money Would Be Embarrassing, Hearn Says
Collapse
-
I think they were offended that wilder is American and was champ for so long and also that he refused to work with Hearn and be submissive. That was a hard blow to take for those who have the “empire” mentality and want to be worshipped....Comment
-
I’ll be totally honest with you , I couldn’t give a fugh about Wilder
But it’s just sad to see people react so much to so littleComment
-
Complete nonsense. Even in a loss Wilder vs any of the top ten would STILL be huge fights (I know I'd pay to see them). Pick a guy: Whyte, Ruiz, Parker, Helenius, Pulev, Joyce, DuBois, Joshua, Usyk, on and on. What boxing FAN would pass on those fights.Or he can take one check for a third fight with Fury, almost surely lose, and call it a career because what exactly do you do after losing 3x to the same guy and there's no division you can move up or down into?
Claim you came into the fight with broken legs & were attacked by your own halloween outfit again? That would be the end of the road.
You youngsters that think a couple of losses ends a fighters career don't know a thing about boxing history, nor the makeup of guys who fight. Barring serious injury, sucessful guys can still beat down 80% to 95% of the population ... AND a whole lot of other fighters.
Wilder hasn't lost the third fight, so all of that speculation is childish anyway. But even if he does he has a lot of action left if he wants it. We'll see how it goes ...
Kids, lol!Comment
-
Depends on how bad hearn/AJ want Wilder to step aside. We'll see how bad they want him to. Your biased, low opinion has nothing to do with the money Wilder STILL can command to fight, LoLoL! That must burn your azz at night hahaha. But, keep clicking your heels and repeating that nonsense ... you might end up in Kansas.
Consider: for Wilder/Fury II, "Per Coppinger, Wilder and Fury are both guaranteed $28 million for Saturday’s fight, plus a 50-50 split on pay-per-view profits."
Kinda clear that no one is gonna pass on Wilder/Fury III for peanuts, LoLoL!
Wilder isn't done, I don't think. I can be surprised too, so we will see. I believe he still wants to take some names and kick some _ _ _.
(PS - My name is MastaBlasta and I approve this message!)Last edited by MastaBlasta; 04-14-2020, 11:13 PM.Comment
-
-
a wilder who has lost to the same guy back to back vs the names you listed=probably an undercard fight, maybe a headliner at a reservation casinoComplete nonsense. Even in a loss Wilder vs any of the top ten would STILL be huge fights (I know I'd pay to see them). Pick a guy: Whyte, Ruiz, Parker, Helenius, Pulev, Joyce, DuBois, Joshua, Usyk, on and on. What boxing FAN would pass on those fights.
You youngsters that think a couple of losses ends a fighters career don't know a thing about boxing history, nor the makeup of guys who fight. Barring serious injury, sucessful guys can still beat down 80% to 95% of the population ... AND a whole lot of other fighters.
Wilder hasn't lost the third fight, so all of that speculation is childish anyway. But even if he does he has a lot of action left if he wants it. We'll see how it goes ...
Kids, lol!
the exceptions being usyk and joshua if they also avoid losing
you really think a wilder coming of 2-3 losses vs parker is a "HUGE FIGHT"? lolLast edited by ////; 04-15-2020, 01:51 AM.Comment
-
Would it being embarrassing for wilder to take real good step aside with also the condition he takes on the winner for undisputed?
I understand taking the immediate rematch but if he could iron out that kind of step aside deal wouldnt be embarrassing.
But I think they worry that Joshua may win and Wilder has never wanted to face Joshua. Well Wilder or his owners. Somebody over at the cult of PBC has mare sure to block that fight till this dayiyiyuy, and we all know that person is Al Haymon.Comment
Comment