Better resume: Keith Thurman or Terence Crawford?

[ShoulderRoll]

Who has fought the tougher opponents in your opinion?

[Rip Chudd]

Keith Thurman's win over Porter is better than anything on Crawford's resume. He also has DSG but he's overrated, hasn't really done anything noteworthy since junior welter as his best WW win is Robert Guerrero. No hate though, just honest. Crawford's resume is just ok but he does get credit for being the man at 140

[EDDIE SPERM]

One Time > CrawDuck

[Mammoth]

Only welter with a better resume than Thurman's is the only guy who beat him.

But Crawford beats Pac and Thurman.

[elfag]

Thurman by far, crawfords resume is trash. Crawford is probably the better head to head fighter but Im done supporting him, hes 32 now and happy to fight top rank cans for the rest of his career. He knew what he was doing when he resigned with top rank.

[boxinggod101]

Thats not even close.

[boxinggod101]

Thurman by far, crawfords resume is trash. Crawford is probably the better head to head fighter but Im done supporting him, hes 32 now and happy to fight top rank cans for the rest of his career. He knew what he was doing when he resigned with top rank.

Exactly. Pretty sure Crawford beats him but it doesn't change the fact that his best win is an undersized Gamboa...

[famicommander]

At welterweight it's obviously Thurman.

But overall, Crawford was lineal+WBO at lightweight, lineal+Ring+Undisputed at super lightweight, and WBO at welterweight.

I value lineal titles more than alphabet soup titles.

[ShoulderRoll]

At welterweight it's obviously Thurman.

But overall, Crawford was lineal+WBO at lightweight, lineal+Ring+Undisputed at super lightweight, and WBO at welterweight.

I value lineal titles more than alphabet soup titles.

Doesn't it matter to you who fighters beat to get their titles, and who they defend them against?

[famicommander]

Doesn't it matter to you who fighters beat to get their titles, and who they defend them against?

He won the lineal titles because he was #1 in those divisions fighting #2. He deserves credit for that.

Beltran and Postol weren't world-beaters but they're not slouches either.

Crawford's welterweight output has been extremely disappointing, no way around that, but I think his lightweight and super lightweight resumes are very good. Dulorme, Indongo, Ruiz, Gamboa, Beltran, Postol, Burns. Those are all quality Ws.