Better resume: Keith Thurman or Terence Crawford?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IceTrayDaGang
    Banned.....
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Sep 2017
    • 15600
    • 2,182
    • 703
    • 194,686

    #11
    thurman hands down!! this aint even up for debate.

    Comment

    • IceTrayDaGang
      Banned.....
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Sep 2017
      • 15600
      • 2,182
      • 703
      • 194,686

      #12
      Originally posted by Mammoth
      Only welter with a better resume than Thurman's is the only guys who beat him.

      But Crawford beats Pac and Thurma
      n.
      yeah fighting lesser skill opponents will make someone think like that.

      Comment

      • ShoulderRoll
        Join The Great Resist
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 56355
        • 10,193
        • 5,035
        • 763,445

        #13
        Originally posted by famicommander
        He won the lineal titles because he was #1 in those divisions fighting #2. He deserves credit for that.

        Beltran and Postol weren't world-beaters but they're not slouches either.

        Crawford's welterweight output has been extremely disappointing, no way around that, but I think his lightweight and super lightweight resumes are very good. Dulorme, Indongo, Ruiz, Gamboa, Beltran, Postol, Burns. Those are all quality Ws.
        I do agree that Crawford pretty much cleaned out the best 135 lbers when he was there. And obviously he did unify all the belts at 140 which is a major accomplishment.

        But how good were those names really? What have guys like Indongo or Ricky Burns or Felix Diaz gone on to accomplish since?

        Comment

        • Madison Boxing
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2015
          • 35364
          • 6,455
          • 3,367
          • 190,590

          #14
          Thurman, beat garcia and porter. Not great losing to pacquiao at his age but was pretty close. Crawfords beaten no-one, having an 0 doesn't mean much cause thurman would have an 0 too against the opposition Crawfords fought.

          Comment

          • JakeTheBoxer
            undisputed champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2014
            • 21192
            • 4,641
            • 2,802
            • 123,960

            #15
            Obviously Thurman. But I think Crawford beats Thurman.

            Comment

            • just the facts
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2014
              • 13791
              • 2,437
              • 1,021
              • 88,113

              #16
              Originally posted by Madison boxing
              Thurman, beat garcia and porter. Not great losing to pacquiao at his age but was pretty close. Crawfords beaten no-one, having an 0 doesn't mean much cause thurman would have an 0 too against the opposition Crawfords fought.
              Yet when your man crush (ggg) was in exactly the same situation, you had him p4p #1. I wonder what the difference between ggg and Crawford is? I'm certain I know what the difference in your mind is. Another black and white issue for you.

              Comment

              • ShoulderRoll
                Join The Great Resist
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 56355
                • 10,193
                • 5,035
                • 763,445

                #17
                Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer
                Obviously Thurman. But I think Crawford beats Thurman.
                I might favor him too but Thurman would be a very live underdog.

                Comment

                • JakeTheBoxer
                  undisputed champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Dec 2014
                  • 21192
                  • 4,641
                  • 2,802
                  • 123,960

                  #18
                  Sure. Thurman is still top 5 welterweight. Crawford never fought somebody like that. That is very different than fighting guys like Benavidez, Horn, Kavaliauskas.

                  Comment

                  • elfag
                    Alpha fäggot
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Jan 2008
                    • 15617
                    • 3,487
                    • 302
                    • 65,929

                    #19
                    Crawford's welterweight resume

                    Egidijus Kavaliauskas
                    Amir
                    Jose Benavidez Jr
                    Jeff Horn


                    That is ***ing embarassing.

                    Comment

                    • RuleOfTheSpear
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2018
                      • 3556
                      • 493
                      • 311
                      • 53,043

                      #20
                      Thurman. That shouldn't even be a question.

                      And I'll take him over Crawford any day.

                      Thurman's hooks doesn't work so much against lil guys. But put in someone the same size as DSG, he'll pretty much whip any body in there.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP