Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Haye Explains Why Wilder Will Not Step Aside From Fury Trilogy

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Wilder has no where to go. The only way that it would work out for him is that he takes step aside money, have a fight and win it. Also it would need for Fury to beat AJ.

    If Fury loses the fight is not worth as much, if Fury wins it would be worth more.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Tecnoworld View Post
      Am I the only one who'd prefer wilder vs Ruiz or Whyte rather than vs Fury once again??
      I'd rather Wilder vs Joseph Parker.

      Parker beat Ruiz in a close match and lost on a headbutt ruled as a knockdown to Whyte, but still had him on ***** street doing the stanky leg in the final round.

      I'd be happy enough never seeing Ruiz fight again after the mess he made of himself for Joshua 2 and that goes for Whyte too in his last fight against Wach.

      It would be fun though watching Wilder shut Whyte up once and for all though.

      The real test for anyone looking to jump the queue for a title shot is Joseph Parker.

      Of course Wilder won't call Parker out cos like a lot of other quackers around, they know they can't beat him fairly or squarely in the ring, or outside with silly mind games.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by factsarenice View Post
        Easy, because he's being offer more to step aside, fight a couple of stiffs and then the winner for twice as much.
        He's getting more money to step aside than a fight purse? Sounds like a good deal.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by factsarenice View Post
          If Mayweather beat Mcgregor I & II most people would NOT pay $90 for III.
          First fight was a draw, and a very close fight where Fury saw the canvas twice. Second fight was one sided however, something looked off with Wilder. Even with the damage Wilder sustained and the dominance of Fury, Fury still couldn't put Wilder down. Theres far more intrigue for a 3rd fight than people like you give credit to.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by VatoMulatto View Post
            I never said I had a problem with a third fight and I'm not talking about these forums. Most people I know in real life and most people I talk to that are fight fans aren't that interested in a third fight and would much rather see Fury move on. The fight was way too one sided to get hyped up for a third fight. That doesn't mean I won't watch though.
            If you read my post, you'd see that I never said you had a problem with the fight. I started the post by telling you what I was pushing back on. The word most is a red herring. People use it to add gravitas to a point but there is no real quantifiable proof either way. I backed my point by saying, the only real push back to a 3rd fight has been on these forums. There have been professionals who have said Wilder should take one fight in between, but none have even indicated that Wilder shouldn't fight Fury again. As far as your assessment that fight 2 was so one sided there is not enough intrigue for a 3rd fight, I'd say that is incorrect. Even if you strip away the first fight, any real, objective boxing fan could see that Wilder wasnt right. Whether it be a result of training, or any other excuse, it was not difficult to see he wasn't the usual bouncy, quick, snappy fighter that we've seen. We also know that for how injured he was, and how dominant Fury was, Fury still couldn't put Wilder down. They are also still 2 of the top 3 Heavyweights, and that should be enough intrigue alone.

            Comment


            • #36
              Haye knows what he’s talking about.

              Haye see’s what Wilder fans see: A very brave proud individual that is more concerned with legacy than being able to buy another high performance luxury car - a car that’ll most likely spend most of its time in the garage.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by factsarenice View Post
                Hearn is offering Wilder a bigger pay day but you are right, that's idiotic.
                Yeah it’s quite idiotic. You know how big Wilder vs Fury will be? Where is Hearn's money coming from? The DAZN price hike taking place during a crisis that allows no new content? You sound dumb and no one at PBC or ESPN is silly enough to tear up a contract so that Hearn can make the fights he should have been making the whole time.

                Clown change your name to factsarenicetohaves... Because you don’t know ***** about facts. And you definitely don’t know a thing about boxing.

                Comment


                • #38
                  There is no need for step aside money, deontayduckus wilderquackus is bent over a barrel.....either he excercises the rematch clause or he fades away into oblivion.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by KnickTillDeaTh View Post
                    If you read my post, you'd see that I never said you had a problem with the fight. I started the post by telling you what I was pushing back on. The word most is a red herring. People use it to add gravitas to a point but there is no real quantifiable proof either way. I backed my point by saying, the only real push back to a 3rd fight has been on these forums. There have been professionals who have said Wilder should take one fight in between, but none have even indicated that Wilder shouldn't fight Fury again. As far as your assessment that fight 2 was so one sided there is not enough intrigue for a 3rd fight, I'd say that is incorrect. Even if you strip away the first fight, any real, objective boxing fan could see that Wilder wasnt right. Whether it be a result of training, or any other excuse, it was not difficult to see he wasn't the usual bouncy, quick, snappy fighter that we've seen. We also know that for how injured he was, and how dominant Fury was, Fury still couldn't put Wilder down. They are also still 2 of the top 3 Heavyweights, and that should be enough intrigue alone.
                    It was the Same ol' Wilder. He was just even more short of ideas as Fury's aggressive tactics took him by surprise. Fury is not a huge puncher so he'll obviously not take your head off the moment he lands. He did however drop Wilder twice and punished with for the entire fight. Wilder was humilitated.

                    Fury and Wilder have fought 19 rounds and Wilder has won 2 or 3. 16-3 or 17-2 for Fury. Fury has proved to be the superior boxer and fighter. Fury beats him easily on the backfoot and even when Fury is aggressive taking the fight to him, Wilder has no answers. Wilder basically only has a puncher's chance so we don't really need this trilogy and nobody would care if they never fought each other again. Wilder can punch though so I guess we just have to wait and see if he can somehow find that money punch because that's his only chance.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Tecnoworld View Post
                      Am I the only one who'd prefer wilder vs Ruiz or Whyte rather than vs Fury once again??
                      yes you are the only one because those fights are all there after this fight. and if you want wilder to do a tuneup those guys aren't tuneups or they won't be paid like tuneups anyway

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP