Let's settle it. Are Golovkin and Crawford the same, just different weight classes?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boxinggod101
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2012
    • 7394
    • 349
    • 398
    • 70,840

    #11
    Originally posted by revelated
    Broner is a four-division champion. Your point?
    As I said, I prefer Broner... at least he tried....

    Comment

    • Combat Talk Radio
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2015
      • 21727
      • 2,781
      • 6,368
      • 83,247

      #12
      Originally posted by boxinggod101
      As I said, I prefer Broner... at least he tried....
      I mean I'm just sayin, people throwing out "Crawford is a three division champion" like that's supposed to impress me when Adrien MF'n Broner already surpassed that AT A YOUNGER AGE.

      That makes Crawford look even worse.

      Comment

      • Inspired
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2019
        • 2923
        • 412
        • 85
        • 34,524

        #13
        Originally posted by larryx...
        Huge difference..Crawford literally won every title belt at 140
        he didnt beat anyone of note to get that though. he moved up when guys like danny garcia left the division.

        Comment

        • Nay_Sayer
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2011
          • 3837
          • 182
          • 1
          • 49,922

          #14
          Crawford is undefeated, lineal @ 135, 140 and a titlist in 3 divisions. More importantly, Crawford's best wins were dominant - not questionable like Bumlovkin's. Crawford has the better resume, easily.
          Last edited by Nay_Sayer; 04-03-2020, 08:04 PM.

          Comment

          • Nay_Sayer
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2011
            • 3837
            • 182
            • 1
            • 49,922

            #15
            Originally posted by Inspired
            he didnt beat anyone of note to get that though. he moved up when guys like danny garcia left the division.
            LMAO

            Exactly WHO has Bumlovkin beaten?

            Comment

            • boxinggod101
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2012
              • 7394
              • 349
              • 398
              • 70,840

              #16
              Originally posted by Nay_Sayer
              LMAO

              Exactly WHO has Bumlovkin beaten?
              Same level of opponent Crawford beat. You call him Bumlovkin, why not Bumford? I mean they both have weak resume but "Bumlovkin" fought better opposition than Bumford. Other than being black, what you like so much about Crawford resume?

              Comment

              • BaguMka
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jul 2018
                • 899
                • 182
                • 1,573
                • 27,192

                #17
                Originally posted by Nay_Sayer
                LMAO

                Exactly WHO has Bumlovkin beaten?
                Shut up fkucktard u don't know s**** about boxing

                Comment

                • Zaroku
                  RIP BIg Dawg Larry & Walt
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 53353
                  • 4,761
                  • 10,926
                  • 389,015

                  #18
                  Originally posted by revelated
                  Let's analyze this.

                  GGG was HEAVILY hyped by HBO.
                  Crawford was HEAVILY hyped by ESPN and HBO.


                  GGG once said he'd fight anyone from 154 to 168. Then didn't do it.
                  Crawford said he could fight at 140 right now or go up to 154. Hasn't done it.


                  GGG's fans said Carnelo - actually everyone in the division was ducking him. Until G fought Jacobs and barely sc****d a win.
                  Crawford's fans said that Spence - actually everyone in the division - was ducking him. Until Crawford fought Kavaliauskas and got two-pieced, wobbled and dropped.


                  G got called out by Charlo, Saunders, Eubank, Ward and a whole host of others that would be considered threats. Never fought any of them.
                  Crawford has been called out by Danny 'Swift', Shawn Porter, Keef Thurman, etc. all of which would be considered threats. Never fought any of them.


                  G's fans say that it's because G was ducked "in his prime" and now he's "old" - despite the fact that G has not lost since losing to Carnelo.
                  Crawford's fans say it's that Crawford is being ducked "in his prime" and he's getting "old" - despite the fact that Crawford has not lost.


                  People try to call out G's low level of opposition. His fans say "because he's being DUCKED doe!"
                  People try to call out Crawford's low level of opposition. His fans say "because he's being DUCKED doe!"



                  NSB. For the first time in a long time...you are finally consistent.
                  I hate you! I love ****ing ugly Filipina’s. **** you


                  I loves trailer trash white hoes .

                  You... demand fine hoes

                  Comment

                  • -Kev-
                    this is boxing
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2006
                    • 39950
                    • 5,038
                    • 1,449
                    • 234,543

                    #19
                    I’m not a fan of either fighter at this particular point. I think both of their resumes are lacking considering their place in the P4P list.

                    With that said, GGG actually turned down those fights, Ward, Charlo, etc. and wanted to fight leaser fighters, e.g. Chavez Jr at 168, but said no to Ward and Froch at 168, tried to get them down to a catchweight to weight drain them. Ward at 164lbs and Froch at 166lbs. But Chavez Jr at full 168. Clear duck move.

                    Crawford, to my knowledge, can’t get certain fights due to his promoter and network. I don’t think TC has actually turned down any PBC fighters. He is simply unable to fight them due to their promotional ties.

                    With that said, idc what’s going on with the two, why their resumes are lacking. Their resumes are lacking horribly, period. They aren’t very good representatives of the P4P list.

                    Give me someone like Canelo and Lomachenko, who have a loss but are known to fight the best. I think they represent the P4P list very well.

                    Comment

                    • Combat Talk Radio
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2015
                      • 21727
                      • 2,781
                      • 6,368
                      • 83,247

                      #20
                      Originally posted by -Kev-
                      I’m not a fan of either fighter at this particular point. I think both of their resumes are lacking considering their place in the P4P list.

                      With that said, GGG actually turned down those fights, Ward, Charlo, etc. and wanted to fight leaser fighters, e.g. Chavez Jr at 168, but said no to Ward and Froch at 168, tried to get them down to a catchweight to weight drain them. Ward at 164lbs and Froch at 166lbs. But Chavez Jr at full 168. Clear duck move.

                      Crawford, to my knowledge, can’t get certain fights due to his promoter and network. I don’t think TC has actually turned down any PBC fighters. He is simply unable to fight them due to their promotional ties.

                      With that said, idc what’s going on with the two, why their resumes are lacking. Their resumes are lacking horribly, period. They aren’t very good representatives of the P4P list.

                      Give me someone like Canelo and Lomachenko, who have a loss but are known to fight the best. I think they represent the P4P list very well.
                      To the bold:

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP