Better win? Fury over Klitschko, Kovalev over Hopkins?

[dibzvincent143]

Both legends lost. both past their best.

But which was the better win?

Fury vs Klitschko. It’s only logical to consider Wlad was past prime but at that moment no one was really favored over him since he was still very very good. Even fury was the underdog..

Fast forward 2 years later he even give Aj the fight of his life.


Kova was heavy favorite to beat hopkins and done what was expected. Many even expected a KO so that a disappointment to say the least

[LacedUp]

Fury vs Klitschko. It’s only logical to consider Wlad was past prime but at that moment no one was really favored over him since he was still very very good. Even fury was the underdog..

Fast forward 2 years later he even give Aj the fight of his life.


Kova was heavy favorite to beat hopkins and done what was expected. Many even expected a KO so that a disappointment to say the least

Totally agree. There's just some very dumb people on this forum who needed to hear it from someone else.

[LacedUp]

It was probably about the same and Klitschko was a lot more competitive than Hopkins was but clearly, he was shot too. He could no longer pull the trigger.

[LacedUp]

what an odd question

I know, but you know how it is larry. some people have agendas and therefore just need to hear it from the masses.

Wlad past his best? Based on what? It was 18 months before the best performance of his career against Joshua. Yeah he was 39 vs Fury, but one who had took little damage in over a decade, a heavyweight, and and in physical peak. It was PRIME Wlad Fury beat. Kovalev beat a decent but well past his best Hopkins who was 48/49.

Some people seem to suggest that Wlad was waaaay over the hill despite looking his career best vs Joshua 16 months later

Apparently going 12 against Jennings proved that Wlad was done. Even though he went 12 with guys on similar level like Ibragivmov and Chambers (before the final ko) in the past.

All because they don't want to give Fury his credit.

[LacedUp]

You are ****** trash

I know what you are, but what am I

[LacedUp]

This is the type of delusional people we're dealing with on a daily basis:

wtf did Wlad do that compares to Sergey?.

How does a person even think of writing that sentence.

[MulaKO]

I know, but you know how it is larry. some people have agendas and therefore just need to hear it from the masses.



Some people seem to suggest that Wlad was waaaay over the hill despite looking his career best vs Joshua 16 months later

Apparently going 12 against Jennings proved that Wlad was done. Even though he went 12 with guys on similar level like Ibragivmov and Chambers (before the final ko) in the past.

All because they don't want to give Fury his credit.

Why the fugh do you need approval from others
That’s what I keep asking myself
Are you trying to convince yourself

[Nash out]

I know, but you know how it is larry. some people have agendas and therefore just need to hear it from the masses.



Some people seem to suggest that Wlad was waaaay over the hill despite looking his career best vs Joshua 16 months later

Apparently going 12 against Jennings proved that Wlad was done. Even though he went 12 with guys on similar level like Ibragivmov and Chambers (before the final ko) in the past.

All because they don't want to give Fury his credit.

Exactly. In Wlad's 10/11 year run, he went late/the distance many times. His Jennings performance was better than his Wach performance and Jennings is better than Wach. Their is absolutely nothing to suggest Wlad was best it vs Fury, and he was the better fight for 10/11 rounds against Joshua until he took that uppercut, which was the best punch of Joshua's career.

Fury beat prime Wlad. I mean, what had Wlad lost? His speed and power were the same as ever, as well his style. He was just facing someone who was a bit bigger, a bit more skilled, with a lot more balls. Wlad was a great HW, a good win for anyone, but he is not as good as Fury.

[Marchegiano]

This is the type of delusional people we're dealing with on a daily basis:





How does a person even think of writing that sentence.

You could answer, ya know, if ya wasn't such a twink.


What exactly do you think you're proving to me? Semantics? Propaganda? Why would I care? Compared to me you're useless.

[Marchegiano]

No one was discussing anything about his resume, but yes Wlad has several wins that are better than 50 year old hopkins.

I responded to a guy saying Wlad is indubitably a better win than Sergey. I said it's debatable on the ground Wlad has no resume. You brought up Tyson Fury, I laughed at you, end of recap.

Which win is better:

Fury over Klitschko or Kovalev over Hopkins?

you brought this crap up, not me.

No, I didn't. Quote me where I did. I brought up Hopkins over Wlad's resume. Wlad is a man on Fury's resume, not the other way around.....dumbass.

You're talking about a 50 year old hopkins who had already lost multiple times recently to people like chad dawson.

and you think that's better than Klitschko who didn't lose a fight or look like losing a fight for a decade

Idiocy of the highest level.

The ****'s that got to do with resume?

Man say has no resume

You say 10 year reign

WTF....is this the twilight zone?

Offer a name Wlad beat, dumb ****. It's not hard. You're not doing anything until you do. Everything you've done takes way more effort than saying " I think Chris Byrd" or Povetkin, or Cheagev, or whatever the **** you think is a better than Sergey over Hopkins.



I write long posts dripping with history for the most part....do you really think I now or ever gave a **** about goofy ****s who are either too ****** or too lazy to read a full paragraph? Eat a ****. You're not even close to my level son.