Better win? Fury over Klitschko, Kovalev over Hopkins?

[LacedUp]

Both legends lost. both past their best.

But which was the better win?

[MUNG]

ill get back to you after i check boxrec

[Rip Chudd]

Fury over Klitschko. Wlad had those titles forever and Fury took them from him. The Kovalev vs Bhop fight was more entertaining though

[_Rexy_]

Fury over Klit

[E-Thug]

Clearly Fury over Klitschko, I don't see how anyone can argue otherwise

[Marchegiano]

This is just ****ing ******. Does Wlad have a win better than an old and decrepit Hopkins, Laced? Too thick for that are ya?

Nice spin bud, the **** does anything I said have to do with Hopkins over Klitschko? It's Hopkins over Wlad's resume...dumbass.

For those who are curious where it came from, follow the quote. The only point when it became comparing Fury and Kovalev is when this ****** **** failed to back Wlad's resume. Now we compare Wlad to Hopkins for some reason....other than it's a winnable argument featuring characters loosely related to the original argument of course.

Does Wlad have a better win than Krusher's win over Hopkins? Simple enough isn't it? What's Fury go to do with that? I dunno, ask this dumb *****. I know you can look back at all my unedited posts on the subject and I never once mentioned Fury.

[LacedUp]

This is just ****ing ******. Does Wlad have a win better than an old and decrepit Hopkins, Laced? Too thick for that are ya?



For those who are curious where it came from, follow the quote. The only point when it became comparing Fury and Kovalev is when this ****** **** failed to back Wlad's resume. Now we compare Wlad to Hopkins for some reason....other than it's a winnable argument featuring characters loosely related to the original argument of course.

Does Wlad have a better win than Krusher's win over Hopkins? Simple enough isn't it? What's Fury go to do with that? I dunno, ask this dumb *****. I know you can look back at all my unedited posts on the subject and I never once mentioned Fury.

No one was discussing anything about his resume, but yes Wlad has several wins that are better than 50 year old hopkins.

[LacedUp]

Fury over Klitschko. Wlad had those titles forever and Fury took them from him. The Kovalev vs Bhop fight was more entertaining though

Doesn't take a lot Although both were complete stinkers.

[NORMNEALON]

I dunno that's a tough one . On paper it is clearly hopkins . But hops was 50 years old and ready to look old at any point . And he did that night . This is a tough one to call and I can see arguments from both sides . Both wlad and hops were reigning champions when they lost . They were both in the twilight of their careers . Altho no one expected wlad to lose . I dunno iam gonna stay neutral on this one . Very tough to call and could go either way depending on what I take into context when I look at either win . Let's say they were very comparable . Both were great wins over fighters at the end of the road .

[ShoulderRoll]

Klitschko had more left than Hopkins.