You haven't thought that through properly. The farmer is a liar whether team Fury bribed him or not.
Have I? Doesn't saying that a proven liar is the one who vouched for your innocence actually weakens your proof of innocence? Then how they can use it for opposite - defending?
So who didn't think it through properly now?
Have I? Doesn't saying that a proven liar is the one who vouched for your innocence actually weakens your proof of innocence? Then how they can use it for opposite - defending?
So who didn't think it through properly now?
The nandrolone case is done and dusted, over, finished with.
This bullshit is about whether somebody from team Fury tried to bribe a witness. The only evidence for that is the word of the witness himself, and he is exposing himself as a liar. Like Frank Warren said ... was he lying then, or is he lying now?
People have to learn to apply the standards to all boxers who test for peds and not chose one or two boxers free of their standards, that is hypocrite to the highest order.
I am not going to waste my time in this one with the other members, sorry.
Last edited by Dasmius Shinobi; 03-20-2020, 06:57 PM.
Reason: Adding information
Comment