Lol...the Farmer is a liar?? Hell you must know more about the situation than Fury.....cause the Great White Doper has not said a word about the farmer. You would think he would say something?? Anything? But I guess with Jurors like you he doesn't have to say anything cause you have already found him Not Guilty. What a wonderful world we live in when you are White man. You are NEVER....EVER GUILTY of anything. Only *****z are automatically guilty.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Hearn: Whyte Should Keep Close Eye on Fury-UKAD Situation
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Corelone View PostWhat is the purpose of a B sample if you clear the guy on a dirty A sample? Don't say the B sample is the same as the A sample. Then why take it? Why test at all if you you hide the results? UKAD? Hearn and the boys.
If they don't, that means one or other of them has been contaminated or tampered with, so the whole test result is voided, and the athlete is in the clear.
Whyte requested that his case be judged on the basis of the A sample alone, which was his right. If the tribunal had gone against him, he could have then requested that his B sample be opened But the tribunal cleared him, so there was no point testing the B sample. Remember .. it's supposed to give the same result as the A sample. If it doesn't, the whole test is voided.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostThe A and B sample are both portions of the original sample taken in the test, sealed and stored in separate containers, so they are supposed to give the same results when tested.
If they don't, that means one or other of them has been contaminated or tampered with, so the whole test result is voided, and the athlete is in the clear.
Whyte requested that his case be judged on the basis of the A sample alone, which was his right. If the tribunal had gone against him, he could have then requested that his B sample be opened But the tribunal cleared him, so there was no point testing the B sample. Remember .. it's supposed to give the same result as the A sample. If it doesn't, the whole test is voided.
Then & only then they are supposed to fight it in whatever fashion necessary,but in Shytes case they held a secret meeting the day before the fight & notified nobody,they never so much as requested further testing such as hair follicle,no b sample,no medical Drs explanation as to how the most potent roid on earth got into the system exactly during the few hr window ukad happened to test him in & in which it was detectable
(& there was extenuating circumstances of Shyte having every reason to believe he wouldn't be tested again right after vada tested him twice along with him saying AJ was using peds with t.u.e. & implying he would even playing field right before getting caught blatantly roiding
(yes he was roiding unless you are a biased fangimp, extenuating circumstances of Shyte having previously been suspended for peds so he knows not to use untested supplements)
Comment
-
Originally posted by kushking View PostThis is complete bs. When an athlete is tested positive for a substance before there can be any tribunal there is supposed to be an establishment that the sample is in fact dirty,& the 1st step is to open the b sample if someone is saying they are innocent.
Then & only then they are supposed to fight it in whatever fashion necessary,but in Shytes case they held a secret meeting the day before the fight & notified nobody,they never so much as requested further testing such as hair follicle,no b sample,no medical Drs explanation as to how the most potent roid on earth got into the system exactly during the few hr window ukad happened to test him in & in which it was detectable
(& there was extenuating circumstances of Shyte having every reason to believe he wouldn't be tested again right after vada tested him twice along with him saying AJ was using peds with t.u.e. & implying he would even playing field right before getting caught blatantly roiding
(yes he was roiding unless you are a biased fangimp, extenuating circumstances of Shyte having previously been suspended for peds so he knows not to use untested supplements)
Get this into your thick head ... If the B sample had been tested and the result was the same as the A sample, Whyte would still have been cleared, because it would have made literally made no difference at all to the evidence against him. And if the B sample had tested different from the A sample, that clears him too.
So you tell me, if opening and testing the B sample was going to make no difference at all to the outcome of the hearing, what was the point of doing it?Last edited by kafkod; 03-19-2020, 05:48 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostThe most potent roid on earth.. lol, GTFOH you childish idiot!
Get this into your thick head ... If the B sample had been tested and the result was the same as the A sample, Whyte would still have been cleared, because it would have made literally made no difference at all to the evidence against him. And if the B sample had tested different from the A sample, that clears him too.
So you tell me, if opening and testing the B sample was going to make no difference at all to the outcome of the hearing, what was the point of doing it?
This would have happened behind closed doors if it hadnt been leaked. Probably happens all the time without anyone knowing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Opti500 View PostAnd what happens if Fury can’t honour the rematch with Wilder ?, that sound logic that Wilder vs Whyte should be made for that belt.
Man man man.... i knew that Fury would only bring shyt and problem in boxing
Im far to support the brit’s side but i hope Dubois will climb on the top and bring more good things for boxing
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jkp View PostWhyte wasnt cleared of anything. UKAD just let him off without any detailed reason. They used a vague excuse of "contaminated sample". They are so crooked they dont even need to explain the reason.
This would have happened behind closed doors if it hadnt been leaked. Probably happens all the time without anyone knowing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostThe most potent roid on earth.. lol, GTFOH you childish idiot!
Get this into your thick head ... If the B sample had been tested and the result was the same as the A sample, Whyte would still have been cleared, because it would have made literally made no difference at all to the evidence against him. And if the B sample had tested different from the A sample, that clears him too.
So you tell me, if opening and testing the B sample was going to make no difference at all to the outcome of the hearing, what was the point of doing it?
You are the same hypocrite ***** fanglrl who has for yrs called canelo a cheat for getting popped with a steak amount of a rampant known vitamin d equavilant food product that stays ages (in ped terms)in your system & that fifa had already determined is present in sonora grill meat which is where canelo is documented to have eaten with none other than BillClinton,none of this convinced you of canelos innocence nor did his submitting to countless tests & hair follicle that would show everything,but here you are like the ***** fangirl defending blatant,cheats who CLEARLY intentionally cheated(BJS/Shyte)who were not even follow up tested stringently & in Saunders case hes still using nasel spray under ukad,his 1st & only vada fight that pos was caught then bloated up & has been unable to make weight @160 sinceLast edited by kushking; 03-19-2020, 07:14 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jkp View PostWhyte wasnt cleared of anything. UKAD just let him off without any detailed reason. They used a vague excuse of "contaminated sample". They are so crooked they dont even need to explain the reason.
This would have happened behind closed doors if it hadnt been leaked. Probably happens all the time without anyone knowing.
Dillian tested positive for trace amounts of steroid metabolites, not a steroid itself. He was cleared of deliberate cheating because he had passed VADA tests days before and after the UKAD test, and because the amounts detected were too tiny to have had any effect on his performance during the fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kushking View PostYou are the same hypocrite ***** fanglrl who has for yrs called canelo a cheat for getting popped with a steak amount of a rampant known vitamin d equavilant food product that stays ages (in ped terms)in your system & that fifa had already determined is present in sonora grill meat which is where canelo is documented to have eaten with none other than BillClinton,none of this convinced you of canelos innocence nor did his submitting to countless tests & hair follicle that would show everything,but here you are like the ***** fangirl defending blatant,cheats who CLEARLY intentionally cheated(BJS/Shyte)who were not even follow up tested stringently & in Saunders case hes still using nasel spray under ukad,his 1st & only vada fight that pos was caught then bloated up & has been unable to make weight @160 sinceLast edited by kafkod; 03-19-2020, 08:28 PM.
Comment
Comment