HW boxing fans, do we really want this?

[REdrUm0351]

And just to be straight , yes he defeated Wilder
My thinking is he’ll do the same with AJ
But there will always be that doubt in the back of my head

I think that if Wilder comes back with a victory in the third fight all this talk is going to take the shine off the win. It will become well Fury wasn’t allowed to cheat and is a bum. Whereas it should be a great comeback where a limited fighter who arguably lost both fights made the proper adjustments and dared to be great.

[Black Jesus]

Not I,
I want to see him get KOd in the ring

[koolkc107]

It's not about what we want, it's about what is appropriate and what isn't.

It's also about doubts being cast on Fury's accomplishments whether those doubts are justified or not.

In other words, the label "cheat" will mar ALL of what Fury has done whether he did it legitimately or not...and that's the tragedy.

Personally, I think Fury has been a huge part of bringing boxing's most glamorous division back into the spotlight. And, we have at least 2 megafights- the trilogy and the AJ showdown- on tap.

But, this can and will cloud all of that if it is not discredited.

Make no mistake, this is bad.

If UKAD has those sworn statements and those statements in any way influenced the original decision UKAD made in the Fury case, then this recanting by the farmer is a huge deal and is definitely a case of tampering.

And that can and should be punished.

For boxing's sake, I hope it's shown the farmer is full of crap.

Not looking good tho...

[MulaKO]

I think that if Wilder comes back with a victory in the third fight all this talk is going to take the shine off the win. It will become well Fury wasn’t allowed to cheat and is a bum. Whereas it should be a great comeback where a limited fighter who arguably lost both fights made the proper adjustments and dared to be great.

Unfortunately , that seems to be the norm in boxing these days
Honestly I don’t think at this time in his career , Wilder can make many or the needed adjustments ( can’t teach an old dog new tricks ) but I do believe that he can knock him out
But I’d be the first to say that no adjustments were made and he just relied on his one punch power

[1hourRun]

UKAD settle with the Fury's based on false testimony by Martin Carefoot. This was vital in the decision to offer Tyson a two year back-dated ban no doubt, the dopes at UKAD read Martin Carefoot's statement and considered the bogus 'Wild-boar' as a explanation for the nandrolone.

How would UKAD have dealt with Tyson and Hughie, without this fabricated excuse? Its not just Tyson who was on the chopping block, Hughie virtually never served a ban ; the Fury's got a judge to lift Hughie's suspension as the trial moved forward. How is justice served in the end? Tyson, and Hughie would still be banned, as they should be, this sport is dangerous as it is.

[Outwest Exp 355]

Personally I don’t want to see Fury banned for 8 years. That’s ridiculous.

[removed]

UKAD settle with the Fury's based on false testimony by Martin Carefoot. This was vital in the decision to offer Tyson a two year back-dated ban no doubt, the dopes at UKAD read Martin Carefoot's statement and considered the bogus 'Wild-boar' explanation for the nandrolone.

How would UKAD dealt with Tyson and Hughie, without this fabricated excuse? Its not just Tyson who was on the chopping block, Hughie virtually never served a ban ; the Fury's got a judge to lift Hughie's suspension as the trial moved forward. How is justice served in the end? Tyson, and Hughie would still be banned, as they should be, this sport is dangerous as it is.

Right, OK so Tyson deserved an 8 year ban for a first time doping offence? That's fine, as long as you agree that Canelo should also have been banned for 8 years, and any accomplishments he's achieved since the offence should be null and void?

[Simurgh]

IMO, Fury already payed the price. It would suck if they ban him at all, nevermind 8 years. They should ban Canelo as well if this BS goes through.

[1hourRun]

Right, OK so Tyson deserved an 8 year ban for a first time doping offence? That's fine, as long as you agree that Canelo should also have been banned for 8 years, and any accomplishments he's achieved since the offence should be null and void?

I dropped Canelo from my squad, when he failed VADA testing for Clen. Sorry dum-dum, I have integrity. People will remember that I was a hardcore Canelo fan.



I was also a Errol Spence fan, before he turned to a hoe.



The haters from the boxinscene call me a fanboy, but I'm as real as you can get. Boxing comes first.

[BangEM]

He is not getting banned and if UKAD bans him he can always fight everywhere else. That’s UKAD and BBBoC’s loss.

No excuses to duck Josh. He’s getting pummelled into submission by Josh.

No one wants to the bum Wilder vs Josh.