Comments Thread For: Terence Crawford: Errol Spence Fight Is All About The Money
Collapse
-
-
Not to harp on again about the golden era, but remember the times when the best fought the best without worrying about an extra million dollars or not. Guys like Leonard and Hearns beat Spence and Crawford comfortably. My point is these fighters are not that great and are likely overestimating their market value.
For a long time, Steward was saying that Hearns wouldn't even step into the ring with Leonard unless each fighter was guaranteed he'd leave with the same amount of money in his pocket. That was a bargaining position, of course. Steward realized that Leonard was the drawing card.And while half the advertisements bill the fight as the Leonard-Hearn s match, the other half bill it as Hearns-Leonard. Mike Trainer shrug s off these compromises as inconsequential. ''They can leave our nam e off completely if we can have more money,'' he says.Last edited by Citizen Koba; 03-13-2020, 11:56 AM.Comment
-
https://www.nytimes.com/1981/09/13/m...n-leonard.html
That Golden era where it 'the best' weren't worrying about the money never existed, man. Times and details may have changed but that hasn't.
Good post!Comment
-
"Golden era" - which spawned a Tommy 'Hitman' Hearns who ended up slurring, broke and working as a bagger at some supermarket.
I'm not suggesting that excessive paydays are good. But let's not pretend that the fighters of the past didn't get royally screwed over.Comment
-
You may be right? I would have thought he understood the game after watching Mikey and Manny bounce?Comment
-
Terence Crawford and Errol Spence Jr. keep calling each other out, but it doesn't appear the next big super fight in the sport can be made unless the commas are correct. According to the Nebraska native Crawford, it's all about the Benjamins in order for a welterweight unification bout to take place.
[Click Here To Read More]Comment
Comment