Eddie Hearns blames illegal streaming for why Wilder/Fury PPV lost money

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bigdunny1
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2015
    • 14762
    • 382
    • 2
    • 167,136

    #1

    Eddie Hearns blames illegal streaming for why Wilder/Fury PPV lost money



    Eddie Hearn slams boxing fans who illegally streamed Tyson Fury vs Deontay Wilder

    Metro Sport Reporter
    Friday 28 Feb 2020

    Eddie Hearn has slammed boxing fans who illegally streamed Tyson Fury’s victory against Deontay Wilder in Las Vegas on Saturday evening. The fight was one of the most highly anticipated contests in recent years following their thrilling and controversial draw in December 2018.

    According to reports, Fury’s rematch with Wilder received 750,000 pay-per-view buys in the United States, which is the highest rate for a heavyweight fight through since Lennox Lewis versus Mike Tyson in 2002.

    To watch the fight in the United States, the pay-per-view price was $79.99 (£62) and many boxing fans turned to illegal streams to catch the action.

    But Hearn, who promotes Anthony Joshua and works closely with Sky Sports and DAZN, an subscription-based sports streaming service, believes those who rely on illegal streams are taking money from the two fighters in the ring. Tyson Fury's win over Deontay Wilder received 750,000 pay-per-view buys in the United States.

    ‘One of the problems is, there is so many illegal streams now when the price becomes unbearable to the customer,’ Hearn told IFL TV.

    ‘One thing I’ll tell you about illegal streams is people think that it’s clever, it’s illegal by the way, that’s why it’s called an illegal stream, but people think it’s clever… you’re taking money out of the fighters’ pockets.

    ‘On pay per views the money goes to the fighters. Don’t think it’s affecting me, because it’s not. It might be a tiny bit but not what it’s affecting the fighter.

    ‘The thing about illegal streams is if you’re price point is £19.99, with the undercard you’ve got to give value for five or six hours for the night.

    ‘You’ve got to sell to the customer an experience where you sit down, you can watch world championship boxing, great young fighters, 50-50 fights, and then build to the main event.

    ‘Not there’s a main event and I don’t even know who’s on the undercard.


    ‘So when it’s £19.99 you can say to the customer, sit down, it’s great value all night, you’re going to watch it in beautiful in high definition without some thing [advert] popping up, and you can enjoy the show.

    ‘When it’s £65 or £60 like an American pay-per-view [price] it’s going to encourage illegal streaming because that’s a lot of money.

    ‘I would believe the illegal streams for that particular show were through the roof because people don’t want to pay £65 any more, they are sick and tired of it.


    ‘What DAZN are doing with a £99 annual subscription, that’s virtually what you’re paying for one pay-per-view night otherwise. I think more and more people are trying to stream.

    ‘On the illegal streams, just understand that you’re actually depriving the fighter of money, but more importantly at £19.95 do you really want to fire up an illegal stream where it keeps popping off [with adverts] and the stream is behind and actually you’re watching something that happened four minutes ago?

    ‘No one wants to pay the money, I understand that. Boxing fans don’t want to pay £20 for a show but that’s how it is.’
  • SinderellaMan
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2017
    • 1394
    • 122
    • 42
    • 33,590

    #2
    Agree 100%.
    Illegal streams prevented this fight from hitting 2 million buys.
    I can proudly say that I paid to watch the fight.

    Comment

    • JohnCastellanos
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2018
      • 2800
      • 127
      • 184
      • 125,754

      #3
      It sounded more like he was sneak dissing the high price tag of the ppv and the low value undercard for uncouraging illegal streams

      Comment

      • Kezzer
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2017
        • 3480
        • 116
        • 35
        • 58,969

        #4
        Originally posted by JohnCastellanos
        It sounded more like he was sneak dissing the high price tag of the ppv and the low value undercard for uncouraging illegal streams
        Whether he was or not he is absolutely spot on

        Comment

        • MaksBox
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2016
          • 1898
          • 260
          • 209
          • 25,846

          #5
          Originally posted by JohnCastellanos
          It sounded more like he was sneak dissing the high price tag of the ppv and the low value undercard for uncouraging illegal streams
          Spot on, and just as I mentioned.

          I pay $100 per year for DAZN... but no way in hell was I paying $80 to watch one fight.

          $20 to $30? I would. $80? Out of their minds.

          So the illegal streamers... WERE NOT GOING TO PAY $80 TO BEGIN WITH!

          Comment

          • sicko
            The Truth Hurts
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2010
            • 34211
            • 2,594
            • 839
            • 151,307

            #6
            Yeah you're NEVER EVER going to stop them, it is Illegal Streams for EVERYTHING too and the quality is excellent for all these Illegal Streams now compared to the 240p quality and a lot of Buffering from years ago

            Boxing, MMA, Premier League, NFL, NBA every sport is being Illegally Streams somewhere

            Boxing Fans want all these big match ups but don't want to support when big fights are made, I will make Promoter not even bother to make more big fights via Cross Promotion
            Last edited by sicko; 02-28-2020, 06:01 PM.

            Comment

            • Earl-Hickey
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 29031
              • 2,832
              • 1,384
              • 297,750

              #7
              I watched it at a sports bar, only paid for like 4 beers, and the atmosphere was great, everyone was booing wilder, boooooo

              Comment

              • daggum
                All time great
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2008
                • 43915
                • 4,766
                • 3
                • 166,270

                #8
                so lower the price...oh like dazn

                Comment

                • Guest
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  • 0

                  #9
                  Originally posted by daggum
                  so lower the price...oh like dazn
                  People consume content very cheaply these days, so $80 is super hard to understand.

                  I am sure there are financial reasons as the purses are very large these days but people need to figure this out if there are ever going to be any more very big high grossing fights.

                  It may be like airline tickets where even though half of business class is empty,they rarely sell those tickets for less.

                  Comment

                  • millcitymauler
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2008
                    • 3252
                    • 529
                    • 542
                    • 38,958

                    #10
                    In my case, he’s absolutely right... I streamed it to my MacBook, and it looked like 4K without a single hiccup.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP