Judges Should be Banned and Fined

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cortdawg25
    MR. Marvelous
    • Apr 2006
    • 3603
    • 126
    • 264
    • 10,616

    #51
    Originally posted by RAESAAD
    This is not a bad idea......an instant replay of sorts.There are just too many ****ed up scores lately.......something has to be done.Although I picked Forrest and thought it was a close fight..... I did not score it due to having friends over and what not,I felt Quartey won especially with the low blow point deduction.......

    thats not a good idea, that'll lead to even more corruption. Having people get together and watch the replay and have groupthink, no thanks. I think judges should explain in short sent. why they gave it to certain fighter instead of only just a score.

    Comment

    • cortdawg25
      MR. Marvelous
      • Apr 2006
      • 3603
      • 126
      • 264
      • 10,616

      #52
      Originally posted by SuckaPunch
      [IMG]http://www.*********.com/forrest_quartey.gif[/IMG]
      I didnt see the fight this weekend, but was it really clearly a bad decision. All 3 judges had it for Forrest, it was an unanimous decision for God sakes. Did all 3 judges have it wrong on similar rounds? I have to see the fight 1st, but its hard for me to say it was robbery when all 3 judges saw it the same way.

      Comment

      • Easy-E
        Gotta want it
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2005
        • 22686
        • 865
        • 1,743
        • 32,777

        #53
        Originally posted by cortdawg25
        I didnt see the fight this weekend, but was it really clearly a bad decision. All 3 judges had it for Forrest, it was an unanimous decision for God sakes. Did all 3 judges have it wrong on similar rounds? I have to see the fight 1st, but its hard for me to say it was robbery when all 3 judges saw it the same way.
        Bonsante v Brinkley.

        Comment

        • SnoopySmurf
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2005
          • 4428
          • 380
          • 78
          • 34,616

          #54
          If there's one judge that is more hated, it is Eugenia Williams. She scored Lewis/Holyfield I of the 12th round for Evander when clearly Lewis won.

          Comment

          • amagnin
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jul 2006
            • 1454
            • 30
            • 13
            • 7,733

            #55
            I had Quartey winning 95-94 (5 rounds to 4; 1 even) but I guess it is conceivable that the judges had 1 round going to Forrest that I had going to Quartey. So in theory, a 95-94 win for Forrest isn't a heinous decision. What gets me is the 96-93 for Forrest with the deduction. That means Forrest won 6 rounds and Ike won 3 with 1 even... I don't see how Forrest could have won more than 5 rounds. If we give the 3rd round to Forrest (which would be for the big uppercut)then it is even more confusing as to which other rounds Forrest could have even won. This is perplexing at best.

            Comment

            • Erik K
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jul 2006
              • 498
              • 11
              • 4
              • 6,906

              #56
              This is another reason there needs to be some kind of national commision. So there can be people watching over these judges.

              You dont see this happening in the NFL where a official keeps blowing calls but they put him in the AFC championship game.

              There needs to be somebody monitering them.

              Comment

              • cortdawg25
                MR. Marvelous
                • Apr 2006
                • 3603
                • 126
                • 264
                • 10,616

                #57
                Originally posted by THE REAL NINJA
                2 or 3 great rounds does not win you 10 ...Quartey should have won
                But didnt all 3 judges give the 10th rd to Quartey? The Melvina Lathan lady was more In quartey favor compared to othe 2 judges so I think that women dont know what they doing is unfair, it seems like her scorecard is right

                Comment

                • cortdawg25
                  MR. Marvelous
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 3603
                  • 126
                  • 264
                  • 10,616

                  #58
                  Originally posted by PBF34
                  Bonsante v Brinkley.

                  That was an unanimous robbery too?

                  Comment

                  • amagnin
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jul 2006
                    • 1454
                    • 30
                    • 13
                    • 7,733

                    #59
                    Originally posted by cortdawg25
                    But didnt all 3 judges give the 10th rd to Quartey? The Melvina Lathan lady was more In quartey favor compared to othe 2 judges so I think that women dont know what they doing is unfair, it seems like her scorecard is right
                    Her scorecard is more paltable than a 96-93 card which is literally mind boggling. I actually don't understand how Forrest could have won 6 rounds. To even say that Forrest won 5 rounds would be a stretch. Quartey landed more punches at a higher connect rate and definitely won the ring generalship aspect of basically every round. Forrest had a slight edge in power connects but if you watched the fight the term "power" is being thrown around pretty *******ly in this context.

                    Comment

                    • cortdawg25
                      MR. Marvelous
                      • Apr 2006
                      • 3603
                      • 126
                      • 264
                      • 10,616

                      #60
                      Originally posted by amagnin
                      Her scorecard is more paltable than a 96-93 card which is literally mind boggling. I actually don't understand how Forrest could have won 6 rounds. To even say that Forrest won 5 rounds would be a stretch. Quartey landed more punches at a higher connect rate and definitely won the ring generalship aspect of basically every round. Forrest had a slight edge in power connects but if you watched the fight the term "power" is being thrown around pretty *******ly in this context.

                      So quartey landed more punches at a higher %, but they saying he wasnt throwing alot. Was Quartey getting hit a lot? Cause a lot of times judges look at effective punches more than accuracy and connect rate. i dont know, I guess I just got to see it

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP