Is Fury-Wilder III needed?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • springfiels
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 781
    • 168
    • 46
    • 11,933

    #11
    No, as someone above said, Fury has basically one every round over 2 fights. Nothing else to see here at the stage, in terms of the promotion, the fight or result.

    I think it has to be Fury Vs Joshua, and Wilder Vs Whyte sounds real good now.

    Comment

    • Toffee
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2018
      • 7203
      • 2,489
      • 74
      • 62,824

      #12
      If Fury actually goes for it, then they're fighting out of completely different weight divisions. 40 pounds when the bigger guy is the better boxer is almost inhumane.

      I want to see the two big heavyweights go for it.

      Comment

      • BillyBoxing
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 7449
        • 488
        • 61
        • 50,228

        #13
        Fury Josh is the fight, i think Josh is a better all around boxer than wilder. Stronger, smarter, better inside game, better défense, better oppo fought

        I always picked Josh over wilder, boxer punchers like Josh béat crude punchers like wilder

        Comment

        • sweetpea87
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 4329
          • 723
          • 1,606
          • 58,530

          #14
          No thanks, let’s see the undisputed fight with Joshua.

          Comment

          • TheGR8TESTOAT
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2006
            • 7022
            • 371
            • 573
            • 131,460

            #15
            Originally posted by W1LL
            Other than fattening bank accounts, what is the point?

            If anything I'd like to see the Matchroom fighters step up to the plate now. Maybe AJ-Wilder and Fury-Whyte, with the winners of those two facing off.

            Fury is without a doubt #1 now though. Don't think III makes much sense for either fighter in the immediate future.

            Thoughts?
            Serious question, why does Fury have to fight Whyte? I remember Fury said he'd fight Whyte as one of his last 3 fights or something? But why? Why not fight AJ and call it a career. Or Wilder had he lost or had it been close but there's no need to fight Wilder for the rubber!

            Comment

            • Mammoth
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Sep 2016
              • 35676
              • 3,828
              • 3,378
              • 378,304

              #16
              Huh uh...........

              Comment

              • BillyBoxing
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 7449
                • 488
                • 61
                • 50,228

                #17
                Originally posted by Toffee
                If Fury actually goes for it, then they're fighting out of completely different weight divisions. 40 pounds when the bigger guy is the better boxer is almost inhumane.

                I want to see the two big heavyweights go for it.
                Fury have 40 lbs of lard over wilder tbh. The différence was in the Head. Fury manipulated wilder naive mind to death then set him up with a jab

                Comment

                • thedarkness
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Dec 2010
                  • 627
                  • 77
                  • 3
                  • 10,233

                  #18
                  No need for a 3rd fight unless u really want wilder to die in the ring.

                  Wilder needs to stay away from fury

                  Comment

                  • BillyBoxing
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Apr 2009
                    • 7449
                    • 488
                    • 61
                    • 50,228

                    #19
                    Originally posted by TheGR8TESTOAT
                    Serious question, why does Fury have to fight Whyte? I remember Fury said he'd fight Whyte as one of his last 3 fights or something? But why? Why not fight AJ and call it a career. Or Wilder had he lost or had it been close but there's no need to fight Wilder for the rubber!
                    Josh ain t coming to vegas

                    Comment

                    • richardt
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Nov 2007
                      • 22060
                      • 2,599
                      • 202
                      • 77,067

                      #20
                      No reason at all. When you lose 17 of 19 rounds as someone else said, that is conclusive. Fury outboxed, outpunched, dropped Wilder, bloodied Wilder's mouth, busted his eardrum, beat him down and took him out and most likely sent him to the hospital. This was a mismatch in every sense of the word. This wasn't even competitive.
                      Last edited by richardt; 02-23-2020, 02:28 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP