So having 3 belts means less than having 1?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • WBC WBA IBF
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 1123
    • 305
    • 0
    • 61,791

    #51
    Originally posted by Kezzer
    You could switch it round and say who other than wilder/fury fans actually think fury is lineal??
    Some think Fury is lineal, some think lineal is vacant and Wilder & Fury are 1 and 2 fighting for the vacant lineal tonight.

    But everybody other than Joshua fans thinks the winner of tonight's fight is lineal champion.

    Ring and TBRB are both in agreement. So no, it's not just Wilder & Fury fans.

    Comment

    • aboutfkntime
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2015
      • 47366
      • 1,631
      • 3,563
      • 391,308

      #52
      So having 3 belts means less than having 1?

      Deontay Wilder had a belt... Tyson Fury, did not have a belt

      what did that... " mean "... when they met in the ring earlier today?

      how did that belt benefit Wilder... ?

      who will become the biggest star... ?

      the fighter makes the belt... not the other way around

      1-belt Fury > 3-belt AJ

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP