So having 3 belts means less than having 1?

[Madison Boxing]

They mean nothing when fighters these goons ain't fans of have them. These guys narratives have wheels on for ease of movement.

But the fact is its only these goons who choose to give Joshua zero credit. Its a much bigger world than just these little salt slingers and in the rest of the world all roads still lead to Anthony Joshua.

The rest of the world wants undisputed between the winner and joshua. Its only these salty haters who pretend Joshua isn't relevant and his belts count for nothing and they are the ones who are claiming to not have an interest in undisputed.

yeah i think u are right mate

[Madison Boxing]

AJ is a champion with most of the belts and nobody can rightfully claim to be the full champion until they beat AJ in the ring. Just having many think someone would beat him is not enough. Wilder is a champion. Many say Fury is the lineal champion but I am not one of them. I considered him the lineal champ when he beat wlad but then he gave up the belts and left boxing for over two and one half years and did not fight anyone good until Wilder over 3 years later. When he did that I no longer considered him the lineal champ and neither does ring magazine who is so big on lineal. they list the champion of the heavyweights as vacant. Fury may have deserved to win the first fight with Wilder but he didn't so he is still not a champion to me. When the winner of the Fury-Wilder fight fights AJ then barring a draw we have a full champion but not before then.

Good post ^

[aboutfkntime]

Order of importance for Heavyweight titles:
1. Lineal
2. The Ring
3. WBC
4. WBA (Super)
5. IBF
6. WBO
7. IBO

The winner of Wilder vs Fury will be lineal, Ring, and WBC champion. That's way more important than having a bunch of other belts, at least one of which will likely be stripped soon.

omg

yea I completely disagree with that one

it is just as unlikely that the lineal " champ " is the best... and no way can you categorically rank the ABC's

fans who forget about all that meaningless shlt are better served

painting some kind of ABC roadmap will not help anyone... the lost, will become even more lost

[aboutfkntime]

The Ring may be owned by Oscar but at least they admit it.

Unlike the WBO which is pretty much owned by Arum and Warren.

Or the WBA which will bend over backwards for Hearn.

Or the WBC which is all about PBC.

Or the IBF who constantly put nobodies in mandatory spots.

The Ring ranks the whole division. That's what makes their belt better than the big 4. The big 4 only rank fighters following specific paths towards their own belts, and they don't rank each other's champions.

The Ring... do not sanction... and they do not mandate

they are just a fkn magazine

[aboutfkntime]

Belts are meaning less. Too many and one belt will have multiple champs in one weight.

It is how you gain your belt or the quality of the named fighter. Collecting belts from the path of least resistance doesn't make you the best in the division.

Don't know what even mention the IBO. I never hear a championship fight for the IBO. I hear more for does b.s. interim titles and that bogus diamond belt.

top man !!

[aboutfkntime]

well look what the cat dragged in ^... and anthony joshua has held the belts for a long time minus one blip which he avenged in brilliant fashion

omg...

now the casuals think that who holds a belt longest is the man

that " blip "... was fkn embarrassing man LMAO

[Madison Boxing]

omg...

now the casuals think that who holds a belt longest is the man

that " blip "... was fkn embarrassing man LMAO

He more than avenged that loss

[QueensburyRules]

Wlad was never undisputed.

- -#1 Boxrec/Ring champ forever with 4 belts.

He and and #2 Vitali never disputed each other.

What grade U in?

[aboutfkntime]

AJ holds 3 of 4 belts...

in what other sport... is a king crowned at the 3/4 stage... ?

AJ's 3x belts will not help him one little bit if Wilder lands betsy LMAO

and I don't think those 3x belts will stop Fury from boxing his ears off either

and AJ he will need to beat Fury AND Wilder... regardless as to who holds the WBC belt blah blah blah

AJ just got dropped 4x and totally embarrassed in his US debut... many insiders do not think he can beat Wilder or Fury... and yet his fans want to crown him king because he holds 3x shltty ABC straps

lets face it, boxing fans are fkn awful... and often totally brainless

[Get em up]

There will be no clear cut #1 #2 and #3 until they've all fought each other to me the whole belt scenario is a joke there should be 1 belt per division and if you want it you should have to fight till you earn it and knock the king off his throne