So having 3 belts means less than having 1?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
there are plenty of awful, clueless, posts... in this thread
this is a casual-fan paradise
I'm outComment
-
Joshua ballgaggers are having a tough time right now. Their hero got slapped around by the Pillsbury doughboy and then ran like a little girl in the rematch. Face it, Joshua doesn't have the speed or skill to beat Fury and doesn't have the chin to last vs Wilder.
Tonight's winner should obviously be the #1 heavyweightComment
-
Order of importance for Heavyweight titles:
1. Lineal
2. The Ring
3. WBC
4. WBA (Super)
5. IBF
6. WBO
7. IBO
The winner of Wilder vs Fury will be lineal, Ring, and WBC champion. That's way more important than having a bunch of other belts, at least one of which will likely be stripped soon.
For me- the resume is most important and whoever wins this - will still be behind Joshua on resume. Clearly they will have closed that gap and have a second decent win (behind klitschko or Ortiz) but they need to build upon it, for me a third fight won’t add anything to the winning fighter (unless its a draw again)Last edited by Kezzer; 02-22-2020, 07:35 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Order of importance for Heavyweight titles:
1. Lineal
2. The Ring
3. WBC
4. WBA (Super)
5. IBF
6. WBO
7. IBO
The winner of Wilder vs Fury will be lineal, Ring, and WBC champion. That's way more important than having a bunch of other belts, at least one of which will likely be stripped soon.Comment
-
Comment
-
Works both ways.
The only way to settle it is simply for Winner to fight Joshua and then we actually have a clear number oneComment
Comment