I keep seeing and hearing it said that the current crop of heavyweights is weak/thin/etc.
Some people say Wilder is one of the best, if not the best, heavyweight of all time. Others argue that he has lucked out with relatively soft opposition. That Tua and McCall — if not lesser chins of previous eras — would have been able to take his right hand, and entire game plan, out of a fight.
Some people say that Anthony Joshua, in spite of his loss, is the best of this generation — a real national treasure for GB — and a future lock for Canastota. Others say this era is so weak that his resume means very little, and he is just another overhyped Limey with a huge fan base.
Some people say that Tyson Fury is a true freak of nature — a giant with the skill set and movements of a Lomachenko or Mayweather. Others say that his resume is ridiculously overhyped, being little more than a win over a fading legend on a bad night and several tin cans knocked over.
So, who is right?
Are our best heavyweights really that bad? Would they have been no-names had they fought in, say, the 1970s or 1990s?
Argue me why or why not you think so.
Some people say Wilder is one of the best, if not the best, heavyweight of all time. Others argue that he has lucked out with relatively soft opposition. That Tua and McCall — if not lesser chins of previous eras — would have been able to take his right hand, and entire game plan, out of a fight.
Some people say that Anthony Joshua, in spite of his loss, is the best of this generation — a real national treasure for GB — and a future lock for Canastota. Others say this era is so weak that his resume means very little, and he is just another overhyped Limey with a huge fan base.
Some people say that Tyson Fury is a true freak of nature — a giant with the skill set and movements of a Lomachenko or Mayweather. Others say that his resume is ridiculously overhyped, being little more than a win over a fading legend on a bad night and several tin cans knocked over.
So, who is right?
Are our best heavyweights really that bad? Would they have been no-names had they fought in, say, the 1970s or 1990s?
Argue me why or why not you think so.
Comment