Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Josh Taylor, Tyson vs. Ruddock, More

[Afi23]

On the question of quitting. There's a big difference in how Spence vs. Brook ended, and Crawford vs. Khan.

My mind is a bit foggy on this one: the boxer who was blinking, was Breadman talking about Brook vs Spence or Matthysse vs Postol or someone else?

[Robi13]

you're right, it's a waste of time debating with someone so clearly inferior and beneath me in every way. Good day biased peasant.

Your name calling does nothing, but I guess if it self satisfied then go ahead do what you do. Talk to me when you want to debate facts and not curve them with your “thoughts” as you tend to do. Aight brotha good luck

[Bronx2245]

Damn! No clue but I want to see that bloodbath

2 fighters with power, poor defense, and great chins! Would be definitely fan friendly!

[Bronx2245]

My mind is a bit foggy on this one: the boxer who was blinking, was Breadman talking about Brook vs Spence or Matthysse vs Postol or someone else?

I have no idea.

[CaptainWalrus]

Breadman’s last mailbag he said Jrock could beat Canelo...

Not a direct Jrock question from reader.

[CaptainWalrus]

Yeah surprised to see breadman not out supporting his fighter. I know you don't have to broadcast everything but he needs to back his guy up. Bit of the Billy Nelson about him .

Twitter..........

[Jab jab boom]

Your name calling does nothing, but I guess if it self satisfied then go ahead do what you do. Talk to me when you want to debate facts and not curve them with your “thoughts” as you tend to do. Aight brotha good luck

self satisfied? Is that what you do to the Canelo posters in your room?

You debate with 0 facts. Your initial comment stated bread brings up Chavez and Taylor every week. That's false. But you get annoyed about it because it shines a light on Mexican favoritism.

Then you complained about bread not talking about j Rock, but not realizing that he never talks about j rocks fights regardless of the result.

You've admitted Mexican bias which completely contradicts your belief that you deal with facts. The fact of the chavez vs Taylor is the vast majority of anyone associated with boxing believes Taylor got jerked. The only ones who think otherwise are Mexicans, Richard Steele and Don king.

Mexicans still cry about Oscar getting robbed vs Trinidad or Marquez getting jerked vs pac in their earlier fights, but when it comes to the favortism they've received, ohh let's all just move on. There are your facts.

[Clegg]

My mind is a bit foggy on this one: the boxer who was blinking, was Breadman talking about Brook vs Spence or Matthysse vs Postol or someone else?

IMO that was Judah Vs Clottey and staying down arguing a low blow instead of getting up was Judah Vs Khan. Not seen those fights in years tbh but unless my memory is off Judah is the only guy who was in both the situations Bread described

[Robi13]

self satisfied? Is that what you do to the Canelo posters in your room?

You debate with 0 facts. Your initial comment stated bread brings up Chavez and Taylor every week. That's false. But you get annoyed about it because it shines a light on Mexican favoritism.

Then you complained about bread not talking about j Rock, but not realizing that he never talks about j rocks fights regardless of the result.

You've admitted Mexican bias which completely contradicts your belief that you deal with facts. The fact of the chavez vs Taylor is the vast majority of anyone associated with boxing believes Taylor got jerked. The only ones who think otherwise are Mexicans, Richard Steele and Don king.

Mexicans still cry about Oscar getting robbed vs Trinidad or Marquez getting jerked vs pac in their earlier fights, but when it comes to the favortism they've received, ohh let's all just move on. There are your facts.

Fact is Chavez beat Taylor by tko anything outside of that is speculation or opinion... bread keeps posting the same sh.it with Taylor and Chavez but no matter how much he publicizes it in his mailbag, it won’t change the history. Who’s better all time Chavez or Taylor? Chavez is, so who gives a phuck about what you feel or don’t or bread or anyone for that matter like let it go, y’all keep complaining and it just makes you sound bitter, I do believe Marquez was jobbed in the pac series more than once and I don’t b.itch about it, it is what it is. No one can take away that counter right hand to settle who was better between the two though! So I’m good, yes I keep saying I’m biased and? Sue me bro, I’m Mexican and will always support Mexican boxers and Mexican boxing. What’s wrong with that? Just because I’m biased toward my people doesn’t make me less knowledgeable the anyone else. I can keep it real even if it’s regarding one of the Mexicans. Andy Ruiz list to AJ and? Canelo lost to mayweather, and? It happens, it’s boxing you win and you lose. Andy and canelo both at least tried... came up short, both got schooled pretty badly but they were there trying to do something and no shame in losing to the best of an era in Floyd and arguably the best or at very worst the 3rd best HE in AJ. stop with the bs that because I’m biased I can’t debate boxing. Please bro, you like to curve sh.it when cornered with questions or statements you don’t like or agree with, but I keep it real. And I’ll keep doing that always, wether it’s in favor or against my people: you can’t even tell us who you support, where you come from, or anything. You lack pride, and you don’t represent anything or anyone. You rather be a hater than a supporter... by staying hating ass sh.it that you “think” is right:.. never with facts like a man. So tell us, where you from? Who your rep? Name your top 5 boxers you follow/support? You won’t answer not one of those questions I know that for a fact

[Corelone]

Fact is Chavez beat Taylor by tko anything outside of that is speculation or opinion... bread keeps posting the same sh.it with Taylor and Chavez but no matter how much he publicizes it in his mailbag, it won’t change the history. Who’s better all time Chavez or Taylor? Chavez is, so who gives a phuck about what you feel or don’t or bread or anyone for that matter like let it go, y’all keep complaining and it just makes you sound bitter, I do believe Marquez was jobbed in the pac series more than once and I don’t b.itch about it, it is what it is. No one can take away that counter right hand to settle who was better between the two though! So I’m good, yes I keep saying I’m biased and? Sue me bro, I’m Mexican and will always support Mexican boxers and Mexican boxing. What’s wrong with that? Just because I’m biased toward my people doesn’t make me less knowledgeable the anyone else. I can keep it real even if it’s regarding one of the Mexicans. Andy Ruiz list to AJ and? Canelo lost to mayweather, and? It happens, it’s boxing you win and you lose. Andy and canelo both at least tried... came up short, both got schooled pretty badly but they were there trying to do something and no shame in losing to the best of an era in Floyd and arguably the best or at very worst the 3rd best HE in AJ. stop with the bs that because I’m biased I can’t debate boxing. Please bro, you like to curve sh.it when cornered with questions or statements you don’t like or agree with, but I keep it real. And I’ll keep doing that always, wether it’s in favor or against my people: you can’t even tell us who you support, where you come from, or anything. You lack pride, and you don’t represent anything or anyone. You rather be a hater than a supporter... by staying hating ass sh.it that you “think” is right:.. never with facts like a man. So tell us, where you from? Who your rep? Name your top 5 boxers you follow/support? You won’t answer not one of those questions I know that for a fact

We used to call him Richard, stop it too quick, Steel. He stopped fights early every week, but maybe if Taylor didn't look like he was about to die. He outlanded Chavez, but Chavez busted him up real bad. He didn't just go down, he wilted. He stumbled, he bled, he was a mess. Effective punches, Chavez threw less, but way more effective.