Tweet
If Fighter A doesn't fight Fighter B for several years, to "marinate" or "build" a fight (supposedly), is that consider ducking?
Because often enough, fighters gladly take fights they are certain enough they would win, right? But then, they hold back on taking these supposedly, more "difficult" fights.
Is that ducking? Or, is it a strong business move in a sport where any fight could be your last?
That's the problem with calling things "ducking" (even if it really seems like it). Fighters are here to make money and hopefully keep their health, and they seek to maximize profit by doing so.
It's the same concept of when fighters only take a fight with a fighter who seems to be slowing down, reflexes dwindling, etc...
Because often enough, fighters gladly take fights they are certain enough they would win, right? But then, they hold back on taking these supposedly, more "difficult" fights.
Is that ducking? Or, is it a strong business move in a sport where any fight could be your last?
That's the problem with calling things "ducking" (even if it really seems like it). Fighters are here to make money and hopefully keep their health, and they seek to maximize profit by doing so.
It's the same concept of when fighters only take a fight with a fighter who seems to be slowing down, reflexes dwindling, etc...
Comment