That annoying Mayweather gets my vote. He is very good. His success is do to being very good and always being in top condition. Fighting good opponents but never someone quite good enough to beat him.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Fighter of the First Two Decades of the 21st Century!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Ryannn View PostPac or Floyd. Pick whatever you want. But either one of them is objectively the right answer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by M Bison View PostJon Jones, Demetrious Johnson, George Saint Pierre... There is more to fighter than just boxer. I would say what Johnson has done over such a long span of time fighting in MMA is far more impressive. MMA has a higher ceiling in terms of skill so remaining with only 3 losses and winning the big one... Yep, definitely not Mayweather, wouldn't argue with people picking Pacquiao for the entertainment factor and for how long he has been seeking big fights even in his 40's.
Comparing a boxer's and an mma fighter's accomplishment/skill in their respective sport is kinda like comparing a tennis player and a badminton player.
Completely different sport.
Comment
-
He wouldn’t be my pick for the 00’s, or 10’s as individual decades but over the course of 20 years it has to be Mayweather. The fact that he beat his main rival for this hypothetical award decisively makes it very hard not to elect him the best fighter of the last 20 years.
Comment
-
Originally posted by M Bison View PostJon Jones, Demetrious Johnson, George Saint Pierre... There is more to fighter than just boxer. I would say what Johnson has done over such a long span of time fighting in MMA is far more impressive. MMA has a higher ceiling in terms of skill so remaining with only 3 losses and winning the big one... Yep, definitely not Mayweather, wouldn't argue with people picking Pacquiao for the entertainment factor and for how long he has been seeking big fights even in his 40's.
I love might mouse but the calibre of his competition is nowhere near the level that Floyd and Pac consistently fought.
MMA doesn’t have a higher ceiling in terms of skill either. Brock Lesnar (who I’m a huge fan of) won a HW title within 4 fights. I think that says it all. It’s much harder to reach elite level in boxing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT View PostHe wouldn’t be my pick for the 00’s, or 10’s as individual decades but over the course of 20 years it has to be Mayweather. The fact that he beat his main rival for this hypothetical award decisively makes it very hard not to elect him the best fighter of the last 20 years.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ryannn View PostThis is NSB so I assumed the thread means best boxer.
Comparing a boxer's and an mma fighter's accomplishment/skill in their respective sport is kinda like comparing a tennis player and a badminton player.
Completely different sport.
Comment
-
Floyd Mayweather easily.
Pacquiao ducked him back in 2009 otherwise he would have won back-to-back Fighter of the Decade awards.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View PostFloyd Mayweather easily.
Pacquiao ducked him back in 2009 otherwise he would have won back-to-back Fighter of the Decade awards.
Comment
Comment