Fury vs. Wilder II Prediction?

[Boxing_1013]

I don't always agree with the ref or judges but you will never find me whining about it no.....so if it's spin it's dedicated and planned spin from 2010 to now

What's the point and how is it any different then guys watching an action film saying "if I was there". You're not, dudes like Bayless is.

When Bayless reff'd Money-Maidana people cried because he didn't let Maidana work close like Weeks did.

Bayless works Fury-Wilder, people are crying about his breaking up interior work.

Seems like when the ref is Bayless you should expect him to break clinches and crying about him having broken too many clinches just makes you a megalomaniac who can't handle seeing things from Kenny's perspective.


It's like that. I favor punchers, I understand why every judge who ever scored for Mayweather did so though....not worth *****ing about.

I think reasonable people can differ at times about a scorecard, or a ref's performance in a fight.

There are also clearly obvious bad cards in fights, which makes it pretty clear there is corruption...this makes it seem like some bad cards may be corrupt, when it is possible the guy had a bad night or just saw something different.

To me, in all my years of watching boxing...95% of fights have one clear winner...fights are just not that hard to score...and when you see terrible cards all the time, it is really bad for the sport.

[Marchegiano]

I think reasonable people can differ at times about a scorecard, or a ref's performance in a fight.

There are also clearly obvious bad cards in fights, which makes it pretty clear there is corruption...this makes it seem like some bad cards may be corrupt, when it is possible the guy had a bad night or just saw something different.

To me, in all my years of watching boxing...95% of fights have one clear winner...fights are just not that hard to score...and when you see terrible cards all the time, it is really bad for the sport.

I'll be honest with you, most the time I run into one of youse I end thinking y'all're bullheaded and lack the ability to compromise.


Clear itself is subjective.

[Boxing_1013]

I'll be honest with you, most the time I run into one of youse I end thinking y'all're bullheaded and lack the ability to compromise.


Clear itself is subjective.

Man no offense, is English your first language?

And yeah...5% of the time, a fight can be debatable...if I score a fight 8-4, I could usually see 7-5 or maybe even 6-6...reasonable people should not differ by 6 rounds or something in scoring a fight.

Byrd had it 10-2 for God's sake for Canelo in fight 1 man...that says it all doesn't it

[Guest]

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=841201

Ah, right, when we talk about "the 9", we're just referring to the poll in this thread.

[Guest]

I think reasonable people can differ at times about a scorecard, or a ref's performance in a fight.

There are also clearly obvious bad cards in fights, which makes it pretty clear there is corruption...this makes it seem like some bad cards may be corrupt, when it is possible the guy had a bad night or just saw something different.

To me, in all my years of watching boxing...95% of fights have one clear winner...fights are just not that hard to score...and when you see terrible cards all the time, it is really bad for the sport.

I think the funniest card I ever saw was when they flew a Fat Yank judge over to judge a small British fight between two lighter weight, lower level boxers.

The judge didn't know either of them, so got them mixed up, and scored it a shut out for the wrong guy.

This was, ISTR, last year or something?

[Boxing_1013]

I think the funniest card I ever saw was when they flew a Fat Yank judge over to judge a small British fight between two lighter weight, lower level boxers.

The judge didn't know either of them, so got them mixed up, and scored it a shut out for the wrong guy.

This was, ISTR, last year or something?

Lol yeah I imagine that has happened a few times before...very funny