Tweet
I don't always agree with the ref or judges but you will never find me whining about it no.....so if it's spin it's dedicated and planned spin 
from 2010 to now
What's the point and how is it any different then guys watching an action film saying "if I was there". You're not, dudes like Bayless is.
When Bayless reff'd Money-Maidana people cried because he didn't let Maidana work close like Weeks did.
Bayless works Fury-Wilder, people are crying about his breaking up interior work.
Seems like when the ref is Bayless you should expect him to break clinches and crying about him having broken too many clinches just makes you a megalomaniac who can't handle seeing things from Kenny's perspective.
It's like that. I favor punchers, I understand why every judge who ever scored for Mayweather did so though....not worth *****ing about.
from 2010 to now What's the point and how is it any different then guys watching an action film saying "if I was there". You're not, dudes like Bayless is.
When Bayless reff'd Money-Maidana people cried because he didn't let Maidana work close like Weeks did.
Bayless works Fury-Wilder, people are crying about his breaking up interior work.
Seems like when the ref is Bayless you should expect him to break clinches and crying about him having broken too many clinches just makes you a megalomaniac who can't handle seeing things from Kenny's perspective.
It's like that. I favor punchers, I understand why every judge who ever scored for Mayweather did so though....not worth *****ing about.
There are also clearly obvious bad cards in fights, which makes it pretty clear there is corruption...this makes it seem like some bad cards may be corrupt, when it is possible the guy had a bad night or just saw something different.
To me, in all my years of watching boxing...95% of fights have one clear winner...fights are just not that hard to score...and when you see terrible cards all the time, it is really bad for the sport.
Comment