Floyd's Illegal IV; A Prefight Ritual Or A One-Time Thing?

[Zaroku]

Floyd getting FOTD sparked, or reignited this whole topic yet again. I guess it will never be a thing of the past for people who hate floyd, or love pac.

boxing is a dirty sport.

anyway, Floyd got the win over manny, and it is in the books, with no asterisk. Nothing anyone can say on either side of this silly fully explored discussion will change anything. if you think Floyd cheated, ok. If you think Floyd did not cheat, ok.

[ruedboy]

You're probably right that the issue won't die but I don't agree that the issue has been fully explored Also no hate involved, it's too bad peple get triggered and can't have an intelligent dialogue.

https://www.boxnation.com/boxing-news/was-floyd-mayweather-really-dehydrated-the-fallout-from-can-boxing-trust-usada/

[Dosumpthin]

You lying again dumbsumption

What am I lying about? Maybe you're just to dumb to comprehend. Doesnt mean I'm lying.

[Shape up]

What am I lying about? Maybe you're just to dumb to comprehend. Doesnt mean I'm lying.

You're always lying when it comes to your fantasy boyfriend, I didn't even read what you wrote, I just know how you always come to the defence of Fluid IVayweather, you must be imagining yourself like a knight on his horse, the only ever difference is which alt you use, dumbsumtion or ******ny

[N/A]

It was, it is banned by WADA

It wasn't banned by Nevada. Floyd & Manny voluntarily agreed that any IV use would need a TUE. Floyd got a TUE. It's an invented controversy. Nevada and USADA both say Floyd did nothing wrong.

[N/A]

That could be a good train of thought if your net worth was the cost of a coloring book

At the time, Floyd was generating a lot less money than Lance Armstrong and that didn't stop USADA from bringing Lance Armstrong down.

[N/A]

It's also against WADA rules

Unless you get a TUE, which he did. End of story. Non existent controversy. Nevada and USADA both say Floyd did nothing wrong. You're inventing a controversy in your head.

[N/A]

https://www.boxnation.com/boxing-new...g-trust-usada/

I'm not sure if you're aware, but Hauser used to write incredibly biased articles trashing HBO boxing. Solely to shame and embarrass HBO whenever possible. Hauser's smear campaigns against HBO were so effective that HBO hired Hauser to stop writing articles about them, and instead, to start writing articles smearing HBO's enemies.

So it's very important to keep that in mind when discussing Hauser's incredibly misleading and factually inaccurate articles about Mayweather receiving legitimate medical treatment. Hauser was paid to write the articles by HBO with the specific goal of smearing Showtime's prized fighter.

Those articles shouldn't be taken seriously as they weren't written with legitimate journalistic intentions. Once you are hired by HBO to stop writing about HBO and instead to write about HBO's enemies, your integrity is compromised and so is anything you write.

[D4thincarnation]

It wasn't banned by Nevada. Floyd & Manny voluntarily agreed that any IV use would need a TUE. Floyd got a TUE. It's an invented controversy. Nevada and USADA both say Floyd did nothing wrong.

USADA carried out the anti-doping test which under operate under WADA rules.

Floyd and Manny agreed to abide by these rules. Floyd breached those rules with the the help of USADA

Floyd got an retro-active TUE, which can only been given in cases of a serious medical condition.

Floyd had no such condition, so why did USADA allow it?

[ruedboy]

I'm not sure if you're aware, but Hauser used to write incredibly biased articles trashing HBO boxing. Solely to shame and embarrass HBO whenever possible. Hauser's smear campaigns against HBO were so effective that HBO hired Hauser to stop writing articles about them, and instead, to start writing articles smearing HBO's enemies.

So it's very important to keep that in mind when discussing Hauser's incredibly misleading and factually inaccurate articles about Mayweather receiving legitimate medical treatment. Hauser was paid to write the articles by HBO with the specific goal of smearing Showtime's prized fighter.

Those articles shouldn't be taken seriously as they weren't written with legitimate journalistic intentions. Once you are hired by HBO to stop writing about HBO and instead to write about HBO's enemies, your integrity is compromised and so is anything you write.

Sure thing. Let me know which facts in the article are inaccurate.