Floyd's Illegal IV; A Prefight Ritual Or A One-Time Thing?

[N/A]

No it was not . It was legal under 50ml per 6 hours for the 18th time.

For the 18th time, you have no idea what you're talking about and you're 100% wrong.

The tue made it okay

Wrong again. USADA has no authority to grant exemptions to Nevada rules.

At the time, IV use was legal in Nevada, for any reason, in any amount.

https://www.usada.org/statement/usada-statement-inaccurate-news-reports-pro-boxing/

Mr. Mayweather’s use of the IV was not prohibited under the NSAC rules at that time and would not be a violation of the NSAC rules today.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/boxing/2015/09/16/usada-responds-to-inaccuracies-in-sb-nation-story-on-floyd-mayweathers-iv/99766200/

NSAC executive director Bob Bennett said: "Mr. Mayweather has done nothing wrong. The Nevada State Athletic Commission has no interest in any type of investigation regarding his IV. He did not violate the WADA Prohibited List for any type of drugs that are prohibited on that list, and we have no interest in it whatsoever."

[N/A]

There some quotes from the commission in vegas . And I will find the life and death claim and post it here too . After that iam done with the thread and u can move on son .

NSAC executive director Bob Bennett said: "Mr. Mayweather has done nothing wrong. The Nevada State Athletic Commission has no interest in any type of investigation regarding his IV. He did not violate the WADA Prohibited List for any type of drugs that are prohibited on that list, and we have no interest in it whatsoever."

[NORMNEALON]

NSAC executive director Bob Bennett said: "Mr. Mayweather has done nothing wrong. The Nevada State Athletic Commission has no interest in any type of investigation regarding his IV. He did not violate the WADA Prohibited List for any type of drugs that are prohibited on that list, and we have no interest in it whatsoever."

My god u are daft my quote was bennet talking about USADA bro .not mayweather . USADA and their protocol was the problem and as per WADA rules which the nsac has USADA follow this was shady AF . Nevada state cleared floyd which is why I've said 23 times now I cant and will never call him a cheater. But this **** was shady . In Nevada the nsac has the final say on any and all tues so how wasnt it shady when they didnt know about til 3 weeks later .. man u are arguing with me like iam saying soemthing iam not . All of boxing is shady all boxing business is shady why the **** is this any different........GOOD NIGHT ....you are apparently a self claimed martyr for the good non shady sport of boxing . The most by the books sport ever lmao . The whole sport is shady how are even arguing me on this???? Okay this was normal protocol according to you. Yet you cant name one example of a tue application not being notified to the commission or applied for 3 weeks AFTER the fight . And the tue was only needed becusse of the amount of IV the treated floyd with . Becusse it was legal under a certain amount ,which for some reason u are arguing too . If it was so legal why did he need the tue .. iam out last post here .....GOOD NIGHT

[NORMNEALON]

NSAC executive director Bob Bennett said: "Mr. Mayweather has done nothing wrong. The Nevada State Athletic Commission has no interest in any type of investigation regarding his IV. He did not violate the WADA Prohibited List for any type of drugs that are prohibited on that list, and we have no interest in it whatsoever."

He violated a WADA rule for methodology . The wada does not approve tues without commission review/ approval and wada review/ Approval . So there it is . WADA rules state iv is illegal over 50 mg per 6 hours and the commission forced anyone in nevada to follow wada rules even other testing agencies ( usada )

[N/A]

In Nevada the nsac has the final say on any and all tues

USADA has no jurisdiction to issue an exception to a Nevada rule.

Nevada has no jurisdiction to issue an exception to a USADA rule.

So no, Nevada doesn't have final say on any and all TUEs. They have final say on TUEs for a Nevada rule. Nevada rules didn't ban IVs at the time, so Nevada had nothing to do with it. IV was 100% legal at the time, for any reason, in any amount.

[N/A]

He violated a WADA rule for methodology

It's only a violation without a TUE and he got a TUE. Case closed.

[DaNeutral.]

Floyd was a PED cheat. What was his reasoning for the IV?

[Shape up]

You're lying. In your very post, you write:

"an appropriate medical setting"

If the medics deemed Mayweather's home to be an appropriate medical setting to treat the ailment, and USADA's panel of doctors and experts (who don't know it's Mayweather when they're analyzing the information) deemed it to be appropriate, then what is the problem? Why do you have to lie about it?

IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.

Wrong kokgobbler, this is the expainatary note for IVs, that’s why he is named Fluid IVayweather

[N/A]

IV infusions during home visits, urgent care or after-hours clinics, boutique IV and rehydration services, and doctor’s office visits are not hospital admissions and would require an approved TUE in advance.

You're lying. It required a TUE. It didn't require an advance TUE. Why would you have an advance TUE for an unexpected illness? Use your brain. Retroactive TUE exists for a reason. When UFC fighters have received retroactive TUE for IV use, nobody has cared nor has there been any controversy. This is only a controversy because people hate Mayweather.

[Shape up]

USADA has no jurisdiction to issue an exception to a Nevada rule.

Nevada has no jurisdiction to issue an exception to a USADA rule.

So no, Nevada doesn't have final say on any and all TUEs. They have final say on TUEs for a Nevada rule. Nevada rules didn't ban IVs at the time, so Nevada had nothing to do with it. IV was 100% legal at the time, for any reason, in any amount.

"The TUE for Mayweather's IV -- and the IV was administered at Floyd's house, not in a medical facility, and wasn't brought to our attention at the time -- was totally unacceptable," Bennett is quoted as saying in the report. "I've made it clear to [USADA CEO] Travis Tygart that this should not happen again. We have the sole authority to grant any and all TUEs in the state of Nevada. USADA is a drug-testing agency. USADA should not be granting waivers and exemptions. Not in this state. We are less than pleased that USADA acted the way it did."

Bennett’s first statement on the IV