None taken. I respect the fact you have a strong opinion on this.
I understand financially ggg and canelo generate more than Charlo. I just don't think its fair that just because they do they get to avoid fights and it be excused but when Charo does same it is somehow detrimental to the sport. if I am charlo why would I risk losing my spot when the other top guys arent going to do it?
The winner of Charlo/Andrade is still behind ggg and canelo and still must wait for that fight, which there is no guarantee they will get.
I get where you're coming from but what else are they going to do? If I'm Charlo or Andrade, how else do I advance my case?
At 30 plus years old, how much time do I have for the likes of Eubank and Keeler?
I get where you're coming from but what else are they going to do? If I'm Charlo or Andrade, how else do I advance my case?
At 30 plus years old, how much time do I have for the likes of Eubank and Keeler?
I don't think the case can be advanced for either. The winner of Charlo/Andrade is that much more of a nightmare for GGG or Canelo because either will have a win over a truly solid fighter and be that much more of a risk, without yielding a big reward.
Comment