Proof Wilder is a fraud

[Inspired]

I'm not trying to be a **** here, but you literally just posted a link where the INTERVIEWER brought up the $100m figure and you're claiming it was SCHAEFER who brought it up. You clearly didn't watch the video. Your own video proves you wrong.

did you even read my follow up post?
are you trying to derail the point i made though? the $100m projection was entirely linked with the proposed Wembley fight.
here's the link

https://twitter.com/snboxing/status/983745193974394880

Sources told me today that Eddie Hearn offered Wilder's side a $12.5M take it-or leave it offer for an Anothony Joshua fight. For a fight with potential revenues of $80-$100M in revenues, that offer is far below 20% of potential revenues.

Adam Abramovitz and Schaeffer both spoke of $100m within the context of the proposed wembley fight via the offer made from Eddie Hearn. Not once did anyone mention doing that fight in the US, at least not the first fight.

[that g]

lol so for all the boxing fans out there, this is how the pbc spreads propaganda. lets recap really quickly:

post 34:

Wilder will likely make just as much, if not more, fighting Fury than he would have fighting Joshua.

then, post #45, only 11 posts later:

It's very likely he'll earn close to that for the 2nd & 3rd fights with Fury if the PPVs do as well as Fox and ESPN expect

and then suddenly, in this post:

We'll have to wait and see how well the PPV does and if he's getting 60% in the third fight or 40%.

Even if it's a little less, that's way better than having to cross the street and give up all control and all advantage to Matchroom. Not to mention losing out on all of the attention and future value from Fox/ESPN pushing a fight instead of DAZN.

lol. clown. wilder still sucks, and the PBC is still trash, but even they know he lost out on a big payday because "eddie hearns bad man mayne".

[Alan Smithee]

- -Boxrec British and Youtube American and U in U still in Barney BigBoy trainers!

Queensbury Fools? Are you related to Sid Knee and Robbie Barrett? Do you guys even follow the sport or just jibber jabber without any real knowledge?

[Monzon99]

You're not making any sense. 50 million was on the table. Joshua turned it down and took other fights. 50 million remained on the table. Of course Wilder is going to take other fights while Joshua continues to say no. Wilder's side isn't willing to pay 50 million NOW, but at every point, until Joshua lost, they were willing to pay 50 million.

Wilder-Ortiz II wasn't officially announced until September 28, 2019. Several months after Joshua lost to Ruiz.

Wilder Finkel's fraud $50m offer is NOT on any table. It was bluff offered ONCE for PR duck damage control purposes. It was never offered again after Hearn tried to meet face to face with Finkel in NYC to discuss the details. Finkel ducked that meeting. The $50m offer was a fraud bluff and it was never offered again. To say it's still on the table is flat out bull jive BS. Wilder has no intentions of ever fighting AJ because he knows he's a fraud and AJ will slaughterhouse him far worse than Sconiers did.

All the rest of Wilder's "fights" were rigged set ups and dives.

[N/A]

lol so for all the boxing fans out there, this is how the pbc spreads propaganda.

Is English your first language? Seems some of the nuances of the language are lost on you.

There’s nothing contradictory about saying that it’s likely Wilder will make just as much fighting Fury and VERY likely he’ll at least earn close to as much.

Nice try though!

[N/A]

did you even read my follow up post?

Where you tried to move the goal posts because it was definitely proven you were lying? Yes, I saw.

the $100m projection was entirely linked with the proposed Wembley fight.

Wrong. Nobody projected the fight to do 100MM if held at Wembley. Hearn was trying to claim the fight would do 50MM and that 12.5MM represented a 75/25 split. Which even if he was telling the truth, should show he was ducking the fight because he's just given Parker 33%, even though the WBO is worth far less than the WBC and New Zealand is worth far less than the US.

Wilder's side said why should the fight be in the UK if it makes twice as much in the US? Hearn claimed the fight would only do 60MM in the US and increased his offer to 15MM, with the idea being that Wilder would get 25% of what the fight would do in the US, but the fight would still be held in the UK.

Wilder's side continued to insist the fight would do 100MM in the US. So finally Joshua said, if the fight would really do 100MM in the US (Hearn was telling him up and down there was no way it would do that much in the US), give me 50 million and I'll sign.

100MM for a UK fight isn't something anybody was discussing.

Sources told me today that Eddie Hearn offered Wilder's side a $12.5M take it-or leave it offer for an Anothony Joshua fight. For a fight with potential revenues of $80-$100M in revenues, that offer is far below 20% of potential revenues.

"Potential revenues of 80-100" . . . where does it say in the UK? Nowhere. Yes, Wilder's side believed the fight had the potential of 100MM . . . IN THE US.

How many times are you going to post links that don't actually say what you claim they say?

[N/A]

Wilder Finkel's fraud $50m offer is NOT on any table. It was bluff offered ONCE for PR duck damage control purposes.

Hearn said it was real. Weeks later, he confirmed it was still on the table and that he was considering it still, but that Joshua's trainer thought it was better to take less money to fight at home.

The only people still saying the offer wasn't real are UK troll lunatics on this message board. Hearn has repeatedly confirmed the offer was legit and being seriously considered.

[Monzon99]

Hearn said it was real. Weeks later, he confirmed it was still on the table and that he was considering it still, but that Joshua's trainer thought it was better to take less money to fight at home.

The only people still saying the offer wasn't real are UK troll lunatics on this message board. Hearn has repeatedly confirmed the offer was legit and being seriously considered.

Flat out lies. You must be a paid shill for PBC fraud. Wilder has proven he's a Pile O Sh. He would prefer to fight Breazeale and dead Ortiz than dare to be great. All roads lead to Joshua.

[Jax teller]

You're not making any sense. 50 million was on the table. Joshua turned it down and took other fights. 50 million remained on the table. Of course Wilder is going to take other fights while Joshua continues to say no. Wilder's side isn't willing to pay 50 million NOW, but at every point, until Joshua lost, they were willing to pay 50 million.

Wilder-Ortiz II wasn't officially announced until September 28, 2019. Several months after Joshua lost to Ruiz.

The fight wasn't even on the table this is proved by Wilders actions in making himself busy and saying he isn't going to fight AJ anymore.

Stop lying because it couldn't get any clearer.

[that g]

Is English your first language? Seems some of the nuances of the language are lost on you.

There’s nothing contradictory about saying that it’s likely Wilder will make just as much fighting Fury and VERY likely he’ll at least earn close to as much.

Nice try though!

lol first off, studies show that people who speak multiple languages have a higher i.q. than people who speak only one. so my ability to understand the garbage you write is not dependent on the ranking of my english. i either understand it, or i don't.

in this case, i do, and the entire reason the pbc pays you is because they hope that people will be dumb enough to believe your trash if you repeat it enough times. the only problem here is you lie so much, even you can't keep up.

my response to you wasn't about contradictions, even though your posts are full of them. its about your ever changing narrative just so you can spread propaganda and create some publicity for wilder.

give it up. no one with any sense likes deontay wilder. find yourself a better champion to back.