Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pac should be FOTD but who's no2?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Caught Square View Post
    I


    Floyd doesn’t need to rematch Pacquiao, if it was truly close he would have just like he did with Castillo and Maidana. I also think the outrage would’ve been much bigger if it was truly close, not just couple misleading videos, which won’t change what really happened in the grand scheme of things. Was it a 12-0 schooling? No but Floyd clearly won, deal with it.

    Who gives a ***** if Floyd never fought in Australia lmao, he would’ve been slaughtered if he fought Horn. That was a cherry pick gone wrong.
    Again don't make any sense, your applying special rules to floyd. That's the thing Floyd don't need to rematch pac? Just like he don't need to fight a decade? Just like he don't need to fight outside vegas?
    Is Floyd royalty with special priviledges?

    Pac didn't need to rematch barrera. Ruiz didn't need to rematch joshua did he but he did and lost. Pac had injured shoulder. Many don't believe Pac but many did. So Floyd doesn't want to clear it up to people who believe pac? Nel o was certainly green and drained does Floyd not need to clear things up?
    Even if Floyd won first convincingly don't mean h ed win rematch with pac or nelo. He was better on night according to judges but there's 3650 days in a decade.
    Last edited by hugh grant; 12-31-2019, 07:17 PM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
      I'm sure srr must have had many losses in a decade but I'm sure he was above other unbeaten guys in decade like marciano off top of my head.
      Srr had about 20 losses so that's about 10 losses each decade and he probably is good value for being Fotd twice if he wasnt already
      you do know he got most of those losses at the end of his career right??? this has to be a troll thread

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by PAC-BOY View Post
        You sound more like a casual fan every day. I thought better of you. So sad to see you fall the casual fan perspectives.

        Let me enlighten you. You mention losses as if it ruins a mans career or life. In fact to come back from a loss (especially a devastating knockout loss) as Manny did says a lot of one mans dedication and how much adversity he can overcome.

        Also we all know that this fight game is more mentally then the physicality of the sport. So not only to lose from a KO much less being robbed in a 12 round fight does a lot to ones mindset. But Manny being so strong minded. Keeps fighting yet another day. And wins again.

        Oh and you sound even dumber when you think as you do and did say in the above horse shlt you posted that generating more revenue makes you a contender for FOTD LMFAO. That has NOTHING at ALL to do with it. And if Floyds best wins were Canelo and Manny....Thats even more reason why those both lame ass fights wouldn't make him fighter of the decade. Winning a fight with a popular name doesn't do **** either.

        Youre a dlck riding casual fan of boxing. Nothing more.
        This reads as if you wrote it with Manny’s **** in your mouth.

        The only posters that think manny should win the award are the group of f@gg0ts that have spent their whole nsb existence sucking manny's ballsack.

        Now you may not like my reasons but You surely don’t win fotd by having the highest number of non American gender fluid f-ckboy ballsack sniffers on boxing scene, which this thread shows is really the only thing manny has going for him.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
          again don't make any sense, your applying special rules to floyd. That's the thing Floyd don't need to rematch pac? Just like he don't need to fight a decade? Just like he don't need to fight outside vegas?
          Is Floyd royalty with special priviledges?

          Pac didn't need to rematch barrera. Ruiz didn't need to rematch joshua did he but he did and lost. Pac had injured shoulder. Many don't believe Pac but many did. So Floyd doesn't want to clear it up?
          Even if Floyd won first convincingly don't mean h ed win rematch with pac.
          No not special privileges. He was a slight favourite, won decisively, there was no rematch clause and the demand for a rematch wasn’t overwhelming. They could always rematch for money’s sake but it’s not something he has to do to prove a point.

          Pac was an underdog against Barrera so even though he won decisively it’s quite common for an underdog to give a rematch after an upset, either straight away or down the line.

          Ruiz vs Joshua had a rematch clause so actually he did need to rematch unless he was gonna retire or vacate the belts which would be ******.

          The first Castillo and Maidana fights were close and he gave both immediate rematches.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by PAC-BOY View Post
            Sugar Ray Robinson has 19 losses –6 draws....does that tarnish his legacy. Or did it ?
            He didnt win fighter of the decade in the decade he had all those losses man..the 40's was when he was on top..near the end of the 50's he started faded and the 60's were horrible for him...Manny has had a great career but I understand the need to be delusional, he does not deserve nor will he get fighter of the decade..thats insane thinking
            Last edited by Larry the boss; 12-31-2019, 07:23 PM.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by historian larry View Post
              you do know he got most of those losses at the end of his career right??? this has to be a troll thread
              It don't matter how many losses srr had, his wins will certainly make up for it against someone who only fought 5 years with 7 fights like Floyd you d bet your life on that

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Madison boxing View Post
                Pac had a great decade dont get me wrong but i dont see how he is FOTD withthem two losses.
                Pac has lost in the Last time he becomes the Fighter of the Decade too!

                PAC deserves this because despite the odds that he’s a small guy fighting at welter weight the whole decade, got robbed twice, Koed once that every one thought that’s the end of it, then still managed to come back and fought dangerous fighters, and manage to win at 40 yrs of age!

                Floyd’s decade is incomplete! He should have fought Canelo and Pac again, and the rest of other undefeated welters.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Lets do it like this from 2010-2109 lets see how manny p4p top 10 boxers he beat

                  Jmm
                  Bradley


                  floyd in 5 years beat

                  Pacquiao
                  Jmm
                  Mosley
                  Canelo- https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/T..._Ratings:_2013
                  Guerrero(i didnt make the list he was on there)https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/T..._Ratings:_2012

                  so what are you saying exactly?? it makes no sense

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                    This reads as if you wrote it with Manny’s **** in your mouth.

                    The only posters that think manny should win the award are the group of f@gg0ts that have spent their whole nsb existence sucking manny's ballsack.

                    Now you may not like my reasons but You surely don’t win fotd by having the highest number of non American gender fluid f-ckboy ballsack sniffers on boxing scene, which this thread shows is really the only thing manny has going for him.
                    can you please say that in English. I dont speak or understand dumbass Ebonics

                    I also never said once that I think Manny should get it or deserves it. Hes already been there and done that so i dont really give a ***.

                    But when when morons like you think Floyd should have it for his 10 lame fights in a ten year term A decade. Well thats where i gotta disagree. When is only meaningful fight was Shane Mosley.

                    Sorry no credit for 125lb kick boxer. none for Mcgregor spectral . None for Injured Manny and some even say Manny won that anyways. I dont think so...but some do. None for Maidana2. 50-50 on the 1st Maidana fight. could have went either way really

                    Canelo has done more after his fight with floyd than Floyd has done his whole decade

                    BigDumb strikes again

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Pacdbest2 View Post
                      Pac has lost in the Last time he becomes the Fighter of the Decade too!

                      PAC deserves this because despite the odds that he’s a small guy fighting at welter weight the whole decade, got robbed twice, Koed once that every one thought that’s the end of it, then still managed to come back and fought dangerous fighters, and manage to win at 40 yrs of age!

                      Floyd’s decade is incomplete! He should have fought Canelo and Pac again, and the rest of other undefeated welters.
                      in just 5 years he beat more p4p top 10 fighters then Manny including Manny himself..why would he need to fight canelo or manny again?? he already beat both?? seriously Manny is not the issue it is his delusional fans who make people attack him

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP