Pac should be FOTD but who's no2?

[hugh grant]

I'm sure srr must have had many losses in a decade but I'm sure he was above other unbeaten guys in decade like marciano off top of my head.
Srr had about 20 losses so that's about 10 losses each decade and he probably is good value for being Fotd twice if he wasnt already

[pasawayako]

aoav is undoubtedly the FOTD and canelo is probably a distant 2nd best nominee..

[QueensburyRules]

Manny should be fighter of the Year for 2019

But you can’t receive FOTD when the 2 memorable moments from Pac in the Decade is losing a lopsided decision in the Super fight against Mayweather and getting chin checked by Marquez that had PAC laying on the canvass lifeless

It’s Mayweather who’s FOTD

- -So it's BALCO Juan and TUE 51-0 conjoined with you .

Who knew!!!

[pasawayako]

I didn't want to mention Floyd in this thread as I didn't think he was a serious contender. But I have to keep mentioning him as Floyd fans keep trying to change rules especially to accommodate floyd.

Yeah mentioning floyd as FOTD nominee is a joke.. If a decade is 5 years then i will agree that floyd has a strong caae..

[lopetego]

Canelo is the FOTD

Pacquiao is behind

[Caught Square]

Nah Pacquiao had too many slip ups to be FOTD this time and while he had some big wins they weren't good enough to cancel out those losses.

In the previous decade he lost to Morales but his wins were overwhelming enough to let that go, especially as he avenged that loss twice.

The Bradley and Thurman wins were very good but other than that and the Floyd fight he was actually matched quite carefully after the loss to Marquez, especially vs big punchers for a while up until the Matthysse fight 6 years later.

The Horn loss was embarassing, some will say he was robbed but it looked like a close either way fight to me. That was meant to be easy work..... Cherry pick gone wrong.

[Robbie Barrett]

I feel sorry for these pac turds. They still think it's 2009, where they'll say some nonsense and they'd have a million casual pac turds agreeing with them. They've moved on, time for you to do the same.

[Rusty Tromboni]

Pac should be FOTD as he started the decade at age 31, so was already past prime starting 2010 so every win he gets he should be given an extra b it of credit taking into consideration he is fighting past prime, being a former flyweight, with 23 year career, with 70+ fights under belt.

Let's see what nel o does from 2020 to 2030 but the PED gate might have hurt nel o and still fresh in people's minds for him to challenge Pac this time. End of decade came little too soon for nelo

Lomachenko won his first belt in his 3rd pro-fight, and has moved from Featherweight champion to Lightweight champion - a historic achievement in itself.

He also has performances that no other fighter IN THE HISTORY OF BOXING can match.

Pac has nothing to match that.

[hugh grant]

Nah Pacquiao had too many slip ups to be FOTD this time and while he had some big wins they weren't good enough to cancel out those losses.

In the previous decade he lost to Morales but his wins were overwhelming enough to let that go, especially as he avenged that loss twice.

The Bradley and Thurman wins were very good but other than that and the Floyd fight he was actually matched quite carefully after the loss to Marquez, especially vs big punchers for a while up until the Matthysse fight 6 years later.

The Horn loss was embarassing, some will say he was robbed but it looked like a close either way fight to me. That was meant to be easy work..... Cherry pick gone wrong.

None of this post makes any sense.
He lost first fights to morales and Bradley and reversed them twice. Floyd won't give Pac s 2nd go so can a man of fair play and justice even really give Floyd credit for just 1 win over pac?
Floyd never fought in australia, england, mexico, Philippines so why mention horn robbery even? Is it really necesary?

[Caught Square]

None of this post makes any sense.
He lost first fights to morales and Bradley and reversed them twice. Floyd won't give Pac s 2nd go so can a man of fair play and justice even really give Floyd credit for just 1 win over pac?
Floyd never fought in australia, england, mexico, Philippines so why mention horn robbery even? Is it really necesary?

I think you misunderstood what I said about Morales and Bradley.

I was talking about the previous decade which he won the award despite losing to Morales. I acknowledged that he avenged the loss twice so what are you on about? I also said that his wins in that decade were overwhelming enough to eradicate that loss and win him FOTD for that time.

As for Bradley I didn’t even consider that a loss or mention it in my post. But you’re probably insecure and just got defensive when you saw the word Bradley and didn’t even realise all I was saying was that the Bradley and Thurman wins were very good and his best wins for this decade.

Floyd doesn’t need to rematch Pacquiao, if it was truly close he would have just like he did with Castillo and Maidana. I also think the outrage would’ve been much bigger if it was truly close, not just couple misleading videos, which won’t change what really happened in the grand scheme of things. Was it a 12-0 schooling? No but Floyd clearly won, deal with it.

The Horn fight weren’t no robbery so that’s why I’m mentioning it.

Who gives a ***** if Floyd never fought in Australia lmao, he would’ve been slaughtered if he fought Horn. That was a cherry pick gone wrong.