Gotta take Tank's side in this. Crawford was getting his ass whooped until the size advantage inevitably took over. Crawford of all people shouldn't be questioning someone's opponent selection. He wasn't wrong in what he said, but he's the wrong messenger.
Comments Thread For: Crawford Criticizes Davis' Win Against Gamboa; Tank Responds
Collapse
-
-
Crawford sounds like an idiot arguing with with a 25 year old lightweight. Tank performed better in that fight too than Crawford did.Comment
-
Nah, it changed when he went southpaw and started timing and countering Gamboa with the check right hook as he lunged in.Comment
-
Comment
-
Until he switched to southpaw.Comment
-
If you have anyone comparing 32 year old undefeated Gamboa to the guy we saw on Saturday you know they're an idiot. Which is exactly what Davis planned to do. It backfired, and the only take away we got from Saturday is his punching power is diminished at 135 just like Broner. Both fighters who made their name KOing smaller opponents at 130.Last edited by Mister Wolf; 12-31-2019, 01:43 AM.Comment
-
Originally posted by BLASTER1Crawfish? I've seen this used a few times by different posters just makes me think this dude is s ***en loser calling a world champ silly childish names.
Put some respect on these fighters bruz and also *** you you kid brain ***.Comment
-
Stank looks like a fughin moron comparing 2014 Gamboa to 2019 Gamboa
Yes , this argument between the two is childish but don’t try to throw back when there’s a five year difference
To top it off , Gamboa with limited movement should of been that much easier
But that didn’t look to be the case for Stank DavisComment
-
Comment
Comment