Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Wilder vs. Fury Trilogy Terms Explained By Arum

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Froch_uppercut View Post
    So...the 100 million dollars Wilder ducked was "unfair"? SMH.
    Another pocket watcher spewing Eddie Hearn KKKrew propaganda

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Champ Wilder View Post
      typical Joshua fans, it's almost like they're blind-folded. Oh wait, right. Casual brits.
      Typical beer drinking drunkard Nationalist football hooligans is all these jokers are....the only reason they know boxing is because of Hearn and Joshua

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by tokon View Post
        Good fair terms; Hearns/Joshua take note, theres a template for how to get a fight with Wilder/Fury done. If you want it.
        Exactly.

        AJ could easily make a fight with either one of these guys if he wanted to, and was willing to offer a fair deal to them. But it's very obvious he doesn't want it.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Froch_uppercut View Post
          So...the 100 million dollars Wilder ducked was "unfair"? SMH.
          $100m wasn't to fight AJ. Aj was contracted to fight Ruiz with rematch clauses at the time. So was impossible to guarantee a AJ fight.

          Clearly the contract was extremely unattractive, involved wilder selling out his current promotional team and giving full control to Dazn long term.

          Perfect example of how not to negotiate a big fight. Meanwhile fury and wilder showing how to get big fights done.

          Comment


          • #55
            Unless there's some poor refereeing or judging that needs immediately correcting then I don't think I'll want a trilogy fight quickly. Plenty of fights out there for them to come back together a couple of years down the line.

            Comment


            • #56
              If its what arum is saying that sounds quite fair. Good stuff. Can't wait for the fight, shame about no press conferences. I really enjoyed the last fight and I'm sure this will be no different. Im a fury fan and I always enjoy a wilder fight. I just beg for a decent undercard.

              Bit bored of the "THIS IS HOW YOU DO IT JOSHUA" nonsense though. If this fight is a major success this should earn fury and wilder around a quarter of what Joshua got from his last fight. I know wilder fans hate it and it may come across as arrogant but it's true. It's just the way it is. Just look at Joshua as a MASSIVE A side to any of them

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Jkp View Post
                .

                Perfect example of how not to negotiate a big fight. Meanwhile fury and wilder showing how to get big fights done.
                Puts Joshua and his team in a bad light.As Fury said if 2 fighters want to fight they will hence look at how quickly Fury/Wilder got it together to fight each other first time around.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                  not the point ya sh** plunger. Pac took much less while waiting for mayweather to make a fair offer. So did ggg while waiting for Canelo to grow balls. At the end of the day, they knew it'd pay off because eventually, the perceived A side would get tired of the criticism from real boxing fans and they'd get an even better cut in the long run. End of the day, when it comes to legacy, belts and cornball ass fans like you won't have the same legacy impact as 2 undefeated top heavyweights facing each other. Meanwhile Joshua sits back fighting lames, risking getting ko'd again, and you jump and cheer him like a ho in a cutoff belly shirt with Joshua's face on it.
                  golovkin still had a smaller purse than canelo , because agin canelo was slightly the bigger name and proven ppv star....same situation as AJ....he is the top heavyweight of the division who pulls most viewers...wilder is the one without any clout and that’s why he was the lesser of the purse .....to fact fuxkstick that wilder turned down his career highest purse to fight
                  Breazeale....the facts gumbo the facts and again are you actually ******e d or what ? Your fighter already been gifted a draw with fury and saved by the ref in the 1st Ortiz fight.
                  1st time somebody who had some dig on him he did the banjo dance.
                  Joshua has been facing ****ers Most of his defences , Klitchcko , Povetkin , Ruiz.
                  Wilder has been shielded with the spilkas and Washington’s of this world who could not punch in rice pudding.
                  That’s why wilder is considered a joke....He has not faced anybody with a punch with fear of doing the stanky leg

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Oshio View Post
                    There's no this trilogy will happen IF Fury wins. He won't take the third
                    If I read the article correctly it seems that the winner is contractually obligated to give the loser a rematch if the loser demands it. If this is so there could be some serious legal issues to Fury winning and them refusing to give a rematch to Wilder if Wilder so demands.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Jkp View Post
                      $100m wasn't to fight AJ. Aj was contracted to fight Ruiz with rematch clauses at the time. So was impossible to guarantee a AJ fight.

                      Clearly the contract was extremely unattractive, involved wilder selling out his current promotional team and giving full control to Dazn long term.

                      Perfect example of how not to negotiate a big fight. Meanwhile fury and wilder showing how to get big fights done.



                      exactly

                      Wilder did not decline that offer because of money... he declined that offer because he felt that DAZN were being dishonest when they refused to open up the books

                      Wilder did not want to be a employee

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP