I'm usually quick to strike down Ali - Joshua comparisons, but in this case -- considering a champ who has losses on his record -- Ali's legacy is very apt. He has multiple losses, but those losses don't negate his greatness. He came back and came back stronger.
The current obsession on "unbeaten" champs feels so forced, so unlike life. Of course a "0" loss can be a great thing, but that 0 doesn't define greatness. Its largely a marketing gimmick, a manufactured stand-in for greatness.
All that to say - I'll take a great fighter with a few losses on his record over a mediocre fighter with a "perfect" record any day.
The current obsession on "unbeaten" champs feels so forced, so unlike life. Of course a "0" loss can be a great thing, but that 0 doesn't define greatness. Its largely a marketing gimmick, a manufactured stand-in for greatness.
All that to say - I'll take a great fighter with a few losses on his record over a mediocre fighter with a "perfect" record any day.
Comment