Floyd Mayweather vs. Porter, Thurman and Pacquiao.

[Code Red]

Yeah cause Thurman and Porter are all of a sudden world beaters, Porter could barely handle Kell Brooks boxing skill back then

[RuleOfTheSpear]

Floyd never gave the chance to the new generation.

Instead he fought Berto

[Roadblock]

Yeah cause Thurman and Porter are all of a sudden world beaters, Porter could barely handle Kell Brooks boxing skill back then

It wasnt the skill it was Brooks size that came along with it, same deal for Errol, they are big WWs.

[MEXICAN STYLE]

Come to think of it the Thurman that beat Porter & DSG back-to-back could've been Floyd's biggest threat to his 0, that Keith was on fire + looked unbeatable before he started ducking Spence

Floyd would've handled Showtime Shawn easily and the result of Pacquiao-Mayweather wouldn't have changed LMAO

[aboutfkntime]

It's funny to me that Floyd fans have more confidence in Floyd than He himself had.
If He had real confidence in himself at a time - He would've fought Canelo without catch weight and wouldn't be picking B-level welterweights and past prime fighters in his late stages.
He was past his prime and He knew it. Maybe He still could've pulled some big wins off even near 40, but imo - very likely that some young guns would give him Kovalev vs Hopkins type treatment and reality check for his fans (With all his talking, his actions and opponent selection prove He was aware of that possibility).

I wanted to see those fights (Bradley, Garcia, Thurman, Brook), fights that no one was suggesting were Berto, Guerrero.

We'll never know anyway, but You should've learned from following career of Your boy James Toney to see what happens if someone keeps testing himself with the best and with various styles. Someone's gonna get you.

you sound broken-hearted that Floyd never lost

ALL of the pacfans who picked Manny to beat Mayweather, need to step up and give that man his props