I never inferred you were threatened. I was referring to the other clown. He seems to really take it personally if someone disagrees with him. Its like i ****** his sister and never called her again or something. I find it odd. Personally, I think you and him are both wrong about the Ali Act interpretation, but so be it. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
And I think you misread my feelings about Haymon. When it comes to PERSONAL feelings about him, I have none. I neither like him, nor dislike him. I dont know him on a personal level. I think we shook hands once at a Berto fight where he was standing with Kery Davis, but that was about 100 years ago......
My issue with him is 2-fold. First, when he got the Waddell Reed money, he went on a spending spree with the time buys. He completely devalued boxing content to the point that you couldnt hardly sell content to anyone, because he was giving it away for free. And yes, I know it was his strategy to try and bankrupt any of his competitors who relied on license fees, but it simply destroyed content value for several years, and its just now bouncing back. It didnt affect my wallet, because I was already out of the business for 3 or 4 years before this happened, but alot of good people lost alot of money due to him. And he single handedly destroyed ESPN Friday Night Fights, which was without a doubt the best development platform out there.
The other issue I have is how he has kneecapped existing promoters, turned them into basically site coordinators, but has put nothing in the place of the true "promoter". With his roster, and bankroll, he should have been able to raise the profile of nearly EVERY fighter in his stable. But nobody is actually PROMOTING these guys. The "promoter of record" isnt doing it, because he has no incentive to. And PBC's "promotional" strategy seems to be to have Tim Smith send out a tweet now and then. Its absurd. And of course I believe he is violating the Act by having a financial interest in promotional activities, but that topic has been beat to death.
So overall, if you look at what has happened in the sport over the past 5 or 6 years, do you really believe Haymon has done some great service for the sport? Things are fragmented more than they ever were, and we are getting more PPVs than ever before. Sure, the top 25 or 30 fighters are making alot more money than they used to, but overall is the sport in a better place? I dont think so.
But again, thats just my opinion........
And I think you misread my feelings about Haymon. When it comes to PERSONAL feelings about him, I have none. I neither like him, nor dislike him. I dont know him on a personal level. I think we shook hands once at a Berto fight where he was standing with Kery Davis, but that was about 100 years ago......
My issue with him is 2-fold. First, when he got the Waddell Reed money, he went on a spending spree with the time buys. He completely devalued boxing content to the point that you couldnt hardly sell content to anyone, because he was giving it away for free. And yes, I know it was his strategy to try and bankrupt any of his competitors who relied on license fees, but it simply destroyed content value for several years, and its just now bouncing back. It didnt affect my wallet, because I was already out of the business for 3 or 4 years before this happened, but alot of good people lost alot of money due to him. And he single handedly destroyed ESPN Friday Night Fights, which was without a doubt the best development platform out there.
The other issue I have is how he has kneecapped existing promoters, turned them into basically site coordinators, but has put nothing in the place of the true "promoter". With his roster, and bankroll, he should have been able to raise the profile of nearly EVERY fighter in his stable. But nobody is actually PROMOTING these guys. The "promoter of record" isnt doing it, because he has no incentive to. And PBC's "promotional" strategy seems to be to have Tim Smith send out a tweet now and then. Its absurd. And of course I believe he is violating the Act by having a financial interest in promotional activities, but that topic has been beat to death.
So overall, if you look at what has happened in the sport over the past 5 or 6 years, do you really believe Haymon has done some great service for the sport? Things are fragmented more than they ever were, and we are getting more PPVs than ever before. Sure, the top 25 or 30 fighters are making alot more money than they used to, but overall is the sport in a better place? I dont think so.
But again, thats just my opinion........
Comment