Mayweather wins fighter if the decade yahoo.com

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roadblock
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2006
    • 14031
    • 3,535
    • 428
    • 108,713

    #61
    Originally posted by BoomBapTrap
    I watched the fight and look for ring generalship, control, aggression, impactful punches, etc. and Manny won 8 rounds minimum in that fight. He won the first 6 rounds easy work.
    You watched it lol, and so did millions of others and the vast majority seen Floyd win it, do you understand majority out side of your own little world, Manny did jack sht nothing and Floyd did what he always does, it was Manny that robbed the fans of a good fight because he couldnt do anything with Floyd .

    Manny is not on Floyds level , Floyd could go through Mannys resume without a loss , Manny could not go through Floyds resume without losses, heck Manny couldnt go through his resume without 7 loses, 7 !

    Comment

    • Shadoww702
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2015
      • 41176
      • 4,546
      • 2,938
      • 250,035

      #62
      Originally posted by BoomBapTrap
      Prime Marquez, Prime Bradley, Prime Thurman all lost to Manny this decade, as well as Jessie Vargas, Adrien Broner, Chris Algieri, Shane Mosley, & Lucas Matthysse.
      And lost to Danger from Million Dollar Baby...





      Get that weak sht out of here!
      Last edited by Shadoww702; 12-23-2019, 11:37 PM.

      Comment

      • BoomBapTrap
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2019
        • 1044
        • 39
        • 0
        • 33,395

        #63
        Originally posted by Roadblock
        You watched it lol, and so did millions of others and the vast majority seen Floyd win it, do you understand majority out side of your own little world, Manny did jack sht nothing and Floyd did what he always does, it was Manny that robbed the fans of a good fight because he couldnt do anything with Floyd .

        Manny is not on Floyds level , Floyd could go through Mannys resume without a loss , Manny could not go through Floyds resume without losses, heck Manny couldnt go through his resume without 7 loses, 7 !
        Why you talking about Manny?This is about fighter of the decade, which the general boxing consensus is that Canelo will win, as he should.

        Take Floyd’s sausage out your ******** you dufus.

        Comment

        • strykr619
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2010
          • 3120
          • 201
          • 104
          • 56,729

          #64
          Originally posted by Carpe Diem
          Put your personal feelings in your pockets. Without bias or bull****, Floyd should win that award. He fought and beat two of the nominees(Canelo and Pacquiao). Capturing some titles along the way with perfect title defenses. It’s not the noble prize award, it’s boxing, Floyd is the best boxer of this decade.
          Being inactive for half the decade automatically disqualifies him. it doesn't need to be discussed further.

          Canelo would be the winner easily if he didn't pop dirty. Its between Pacquiao and Canelo.

          Comment

          • Lomasexual
            Loma is inside you
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2017
            • 3071
            • 243
            • 180
            • 84,250

            #65
            Floyd is the best fighter I have seen since RJJ, and was the greatest in the ATG sense who was active during the last decade.

            Yes, he was only active for half of the decade. That might be relevant to people, it might not.

            I'd be happy enough with him winning. If the criteria is 'who is the best fighter who was active in the decade' then he has to win. If there is a minimum number of years that you had to fight in the decade to be considered, I'd say that five is enough.

            Comment

            • Roadblock
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2006
              • 14031
              • 3,535
              • 428
              • 108,713

              #66
              Originally posted by BoomBapTrap
              Why you talking about Manny?This is about fighter of the decade, which the general boxing consensus is that Canelo will win, as he should.

              Take Floyd’s sausage out your ******** you dufus.
              Im just taking you into deep water to show what you dont know, I like watching kid fanboys expose themselves, its verging on cringeworthy the BS they spin, only a rank beginner will ever talk like you about boxing, you stand out like the village idiot lol.

              Comment

              • Roadblock
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2006
                • 14031
                • 3,535
                • 428
                • 108,713

                #67
                Originally posted by strykr619
                Being inactive for half the decade automatically disqualifies him. it doesn't need to be discussed further.

                Canelo would be the winner easily if he didn't pop dirty. Its between Pacquiao and Canelo.
                Really, show me where it officially states this .

                More fan BS.

                Comment

                • BoomBapTrap
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Aug 2019
                  • 1044
                  • 39
                  • 0
                  • 33,395

                  #68
                  Originally posted by Lomasexual
                  Floyd is the best fighter I have seen since RJJ, and was the greatest in the ATG sense who was active during the last decade.

                  Yes, he was only active for half of the decade. That might be relevant to people, it might not.

                  I'd be happy enough with him winning. If the criteria is 'who is the best fighter who was active in the decade' then he has to win. If there is a minimum number of years that you had to fight in the decade to be considered, I'd say that five is enough.
                  The minimum number is TEN!
                  It’s called FIGHTER OF THE DECADE!

                  Decade equates to TEN!

                  Comment

                  • Shadoww702
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2015
                    • 41176
                    • 4,546
                    • 2,938
                    • 250,035

                    #69
                    Originally posted by BoomBapTrap
                    I watched the fight and look for ring generalship, control, aggression, impactful punches, etc. and Manny won 8 rounds minimum in that fight. He won the first 6 rounds easy work.
                    Huhh???? Man almost EVERYONE AND all three judges gave Thurman round 6. Round three 50/50?

                    8 rounds MINIMUM??? Your related to CJ Ross and Byrd??? You probably gave Pac 15 rounds to 3? Even through in a couple 11-7 and 12-8 rounds...This is you scoring pac fights

                    Comment

                    • Roadblock
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 14031
                      • 3,535
                      • 428
                      • 108,713

                      #70
                      Originally posted by BoomBapTrap
                      The minimum number is TEN!
                      It’s called FIGHTER OF THE DECADE!

                      Decade equates to TEN!
                      Youre as dumb as a fence post, its what you achieve inside the decade .

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP