Whomever keeps on fighting tomato cans.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who has the brighter future? Tank or Haney?
Collapse
-
I dont get the people who are saying Tank.
Tank is a "KO artist" who only fights smaller or aging boxers. That's it.
His best win over a severly weight drained Pedraza doesnt say much because Pedraza fought dumb. I dont think Tank has the tools to close the distance and land on someone longer than himself.
Hes also do damn small at what 5'5". Think of all the guys Lomachenko is fighting at 135 and how he "struggles" to get in range. Even with the superior footwork and handspeed even he gets hit. Does tank have better defense than Loma? Nope.
What's tank gonna do against guys who are much bigger than himself? Campbell is like 5'11 with 71 inches of reach. Haney is like the exact same size.
He cant be a weight bully anymore and ha, dude and his promoters are acting like Gamboa turned back the clock 15 years. Come on. Hes at his absolute physical limit at 135.
Haney on the other hand is huge for 135 and has the size to move all the way up to MW or higher. Hes also younger. So how can Tank have a brighter future than Haney?
Comment
-
Haney and the main reason is his size. People overlooking that Tank is literally about 5'3 in real life and fights at low weight classes that historically don't produce many cross over stars. His lack of height puts a limit a ceiling on how high he can move up in weight classes. And this is before you get into his weigh problems and lack of discipline he is. He is going burn out quickly and continue fighting at low weight classes I don't see a long career with a guy who get's like this in between fights at this young a age.
Haney is a big boy a full 5'8 and still growing. He is already talking about fighting at 140 and by the time he is in his prime will be a full fledged welterweight. Historically welterweight is where all the money and attention is at. A welterweight crossing over vs a bloated midget super featherweight? Give me the Welterweight
Comment
-
Originally posted by R-Hand Southpaw View PostI dont get the people who are saying Tank.
Tank is a "KO artist" who only fights smaller or aging boxers. That's it.
His best win over a severly weight drained Pedraza doesnt say much because Pedraza fought dumb. I dont think Tank has the tools to close the distance and land on someone longer than himself.
Hes also do damn small at what 5'5". Think of all the guys Lomachenko is fighting at 135 and how he "struggles" to get in range. Even with the superior footwork and handspeed even he gets hit. Does tank have better defense than Loma? Nope.
What's tank gonna do against guys who are much bigger than himself? Campbell is like 5'11 with 71 inches of reach. Haney is like the exact same size.
He cant be a weight bully anymore and ha, dude and his promoters are acting like Gamboa turned back the clock 15 years. Come on. Hes at his absolute physical limit at 135.
Haney on the other hand is huge for 135 and has the size to move all the way up to MW or higher. Hes also younger. So how can Tank have a brighter future than Haney?
Floyd is exactly 5'8 look at him standing side by side with Floyd looks like a midget. He's not 5'5 he's closer to 5'3
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostHaney and the main reason is his size. People overlooking that Tank is literally about 5'3 in real life and fights at low weight classes that historically don't produce many cross over stars. His lack of height puts a limit a ceiling on how high he can move up in weight classes. And this is before you get into his weigh problems and lack of discipline he is. He is going burn out quickly and continue fighting at low weight classes I don't see a long career with a guy who get's like this in between fights at this young a age.
Haney is a big boy a full 5'8 and still growing. He is already talking about fighting at 140 and by the time he is in his prime will be a full fledged welterweight. Historically welterweight is where all the money and attention is at. A welterweight crossing over vs a bloated midget super featherweight? Give me the Welterweight
Isn't pacs height around 5'5?
Comment
-
Originally posted by HitmanTommy View PostIsn't pacs height around 5'5?
Thurman and Liam Walsh are both listed at 5'7 1/2
This is Pacquiao next to Thurman and Tank next to Walsh
He's not 5'5 he's closer to 5'3Last edited by bigdunny1; 12-20-2019, 12:03 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostBoxrec has Gervonta and Pacquiao listed the exact same height. But look at what a real 5'5 next to 5'8 looks like
Thurman and Liam Walsh are both listed at 5'7 1/2
This is Pacquiao next to Thurman and Tank next to Walsh
He's not 5'5 he's closer to 5'3
Comment
-
Comment