crawford is the 5th best ww right now...
Collapse
-
-
yes, i have no reason to believe otherwise....kava dropping crawford is just another testament of his suspect chin like poeple have been sayin since the gamboa fightComment
-
Thurman is not shot, he defeated Lopez and was undefeated at 30 years old. Pacquiao is just the better boxer even at age 40. Stop posting if you’re just gonna post jibberish.Thurman is shot. He got devastated by Josesito Lopez. The PBC fan boys would ejaculate all over this message board if Crawford had a fight against Lopez that resembled that Lopez fight. Thurman was also completely outclassed by Pacquiao. We all know a Crawford-Pacquiao fight would be at the very least competitive.
Porter has lost every time he’s stepped up. He also got a gift against Ugas, who won 8 rounds of that fight. Porter is a gate keeper at welterweight.
If you think Spence and Pacquiao are better, I have no problem with that. But thinking Thurman and Porter are better is an absolute joke.
Crawford, if he’s not going to fight any PBC fighters, needs to move up and fight an elite opponent then. Stop chasing that Pacquiao fight. Crawford might beat Pac at this stage but PAC is literally turning 41 this month. It won’t prove crap.
And Pac still has a good chance against Crawford, plus Prime PAC SLAUGHTERS Crawford and Spence.
Move up in weight and fight an elite opponent if you’re not gonna box Spence, Thurman, Porter or DSG.Comment
-
A razor thin split decision that Pac was out landed (both power punches and total punches) = completely outclassed? Really??Thurman is shot. He got devastated by Josesito Lopez. The PBC fan boys would ejaculate all over this message board if Crawford had a fight against Lopez that resembled that Lopez fight. Thurman was also completely outclassed by Pacquiao. We all know a Crawford-Pacquiao fight would be at the very least competitive.
Porter has lost every time he’s stepped up. He also got a gift against Ugas, who won 8 rounds of that fight. Porter is a gate keeper at welterweight.
If you think Spence and Pacquiao are better, I have no problem with that. But thinking Thurman and Porter are better is an absolute joke.Comment
-
considering the quality of performance and opponents
right behind
pac
spence
porter
thurman
the only reason why he is 3rd is because both porter and thurman just lost to number 1 and number 2 where both were very competitive
crawford just fought a competitive fight vs the nmber 11 guy and got hurt (that was a KD )
the eye test result says crawford is number 5 ww imo
oh my god
AWFUL post !
the only guy who could beat Crawford is Spence... and yea, I got Crawford in that fight

no idea what some of you guys see when you watch boxingComment
-
Thank the heavens! Best post of the night.
Thank you sir!
To bad nobody, and mean nobody at PBC shares the same confidence these arm chair experts do.Comment
-
You obviously haven’t seen the fight. Thurman was completely outclassed by Pac. It was one of Pac’s easiest fights. He even took the middle rounds off and closed him in the last 3.
Anybody who actually WATCHES BOXING AND WATCHED that fight knows that.
Come back and post after you watch the Thurman Pac fight bud.Comment
-
Crawfords done nothing at 147 and in his whole career hes never fought a world class opponent. Now hes having problems against c level welterweights, but hes p4p number 1 apparently
Comment
-
Only PBC fans see it that way. Normal none cultified Boxing fans mostly seem to have Crawford as their number 1 Welter and they also feel like the PBC Welters are being protected from him.Comment
-
Yup I don't think anybody beats crawford.
It's between him, spence and pacquiao and I think crawford beats them all.
Old Pacquiao wants no part of Crawford. How many opportunities has he had to fight him now? He decided to pick lighter opposition instead.Comment
Comment