ESPN rates Bud as P4P #1 your pick?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • redmyth79
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 638
    • 30
    • 0
    • 15,165

    #1

    ESPN rates Bud as P4P #1 your pick?

    I have listened to ESPN talk up Crawford yet he is great but he is yet to face a top 5 boxer at welterweight!! So it's extremely hard for me to give him that credit especially over Loma's great work with hardly a pro career but Canelo has a resume that be eats them all minus Manny possibly!
    Canelo is a Champ in 3 different weight classes and 160-175 don't forget the 154 to but that's all leagues above the fight that you get in the lower weights as a 175lb fighter is so much different in power then a guy that has won belts at 135, 140 and 147!
    But I do give Bud props! He is a great fighter I actually put him tied for 2nd with Loma with Canelo #1.
    Would love to here your opinions and why?
    Also a issue I have with ESPN's rating is he is a ESPN fighter so why would they not give him the nod but Loma is to so I find they put Loma's accomplishments behind his. And I can to possibly see that.
    He is a great fighter but not P4P #1
  • patrick_p
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Aug 2006
    • 240
    • 46
    • 1
    • 10,406

    #2
    And yet Bud thinks fighting a journeyman who lost to Robinson grants him PBP top but Canelo moving up 2 weight classes and knocking out a champion is anything less than this shameful Arum scam.

    Comment

    • boxinggod101
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Apr 2012
      • 7404
      • 352
      • 413
      • 70,840

      #3
      Hell no. Canelo is. There is no way Crawford is. Resume is way too weak

      Comment

      • PRchamp
        Miami Vice
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2008
        • 2457
        • 496
        • 131
        • 25,427

        #4
        Crawford is a special fighter but he needs better fights. Also to me his chin is still a huge question mark, he’s never fought a fighter who processes heavy hands.....mean machine breaks you down and doesn’t have good power but he buzzed Crawford a couple Of times

        Comment

        • Legends456
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2019
          • 1353
          • 160
          • 949
          • 52,257

          #5
          Huge fan of Loma and Crawford here.

          I think Crawford by the eye test is elite (but I know a lot of people don’t like the eye test).

          He has skill, agility, heart, and ring IQ. He reminds me a bit of SRL. He NEEDS to get the big fights though to prove it, I hear ya.

          Loma is great, but I think he doesn’t look as sharp at LW as he did at his old weight (130 I think?)

          Lots of other great fighters and boxers out there right now.

          Canelo’s obviously good, but I have an issue with the clenbuterol and lots of scores going too far in his favor, and something very odd about his fight with Kovalev. Not calling it a fix, but something senses off to me there.

          My P4P right now looks like this:

          1. Crawford
          2. Spence
          3. Alvarez
          4. Lomachenko
          5. Wilder
          6. Inoue
          7. Charlo
          8. Andrade
          9. Usyk
          10. Lopez

          Just off the top of my head anyways. It might look a little different if I consulted boxrec and refreshed my memory of who holds what belt and who’s fought whom...

          Comment

          • Redd Foxx
            Hittin' the heavy bag.
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2011
            • 22007
            • 1,180
            • 2,316
            • 1,257,197

            #6
            For me, same as before. I think Loma and Bud are equally talented, but I give Loma a slight edge in p4p based on resume. It's pretty much a tie though.
            Canelo is not on their level.

            Comment

            • kidbazooka
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2015
              • 10062
              • 278
              • 2
              • 133,405

              #7
              Hahahaha hell no!!

              ESPN is a joke everyone knows canelo is p4p #1

              Comment

              • kidbazooka
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2015
                • 10062
                • 278
                • 2
                • 133,405

                #8
                Originally posted by Redd Foxx
                For me, same as before. I think Loma and Bud are equally talented, but I give Loma a slight edge in p4p based on resume. It's pretty much a tie though.
                Canelo is not on their level.
                You are a damn idiot if you think beating that lituaninan bum is better than beating big ass Kova lol

                The hate strong with you guys

                Comment

                • Mister Wolf
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jan 2012
                  • 7440
                  • 242
                  • 15
                  • 107,507

                  #9
                  Originally posted by PRchamp
                  Crawford is a special fighter but he needs better fights. Also to me his chin is still a huge question mark, he’s never fought a fighter who processes heavy hands.....mean machine breaks you down and doesn’t have good power but he buzzed Crawford a couple Of times


                  Is Mikey lying?

                  Comment

                  • hansS
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Dec 2019
                    • 243
                    • 194
                    • 171
                    • 11,067

                    #10
                    I can see Crawford at number one but it's debatable.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP