Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who gets your vote for boxer of the year??

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Sad to say but it is Canelo.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by historian larry View Post
      what test did Canelo fail this year?
      Yes, I kind of feel failing a test has long term consequences.
      It might effect his chance of fotd, as well as foty.

      Comment


      • #73
        Inoue or Canelo. I'd go with Canelo.

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
          Erroll Spence, Jr.

          Naoya Inoue

          Deontay Wilder

          Manny Pacquiao

          Julian J-Rock Williams

          Andy Ruiz

          Josh Taylor
          Why no Canelo?

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
            The only way it's be a cherry pick for a 23 year, 71 fight veteran at 41, who floyd, crawford, spence ducked is because the standards for pac are too high. Thurman was favourite until everyone started betting on Pac to win.
            If beating people coming off poor last performances is so easy why do n t Floyd fight Ggg right now.? In fact why don't Floyd fight callum Smith in next fight? Callum looked a bit overrated in.last fight. Surely Floyd could beat him. Only problem is, Floyd won't get credit as it would be deemed a cherry pick by your logic?
            Keep it consistent. Stick to WW. Pacquiao has not fought MW or SM.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
              Yes, I kind of feel failing a test has long term consequences.
              It might effect his chance of fotd, as well as foty.
              he already won fighter of the year

              Comment


              • #77
                inoue is foty
                then pacman
                Last edited by JOITATS; 12-29-2019, 02:10 PM.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by siablo14 View Post
                  Why no Canelo?
                  I don't give credit to those who beat up old, low risk, washed up cherry pick fighters like Canelo.

                  I was far from impressed by his Kovalev victory because I both called it and anticipated it. He took the fight because Sergei's skills were diminished and on the decline.

                  If Kov was prime, at full strength and at his physical peak Canelo would have never fought him; Let alone go within a 100 feet of him.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
                    I don't give credit to those who beat up old, low risk, washed up cherry pick fighters like Canelo.

                    I was far from impressed by his Kovalev victory because I both called it and anticipated it. He took the fight because Sergei's skills were diminished and on the decline.

                    If Kov was prime, at full strength and at his physical peak Canelo would have never fought him; Let alone go within a 100 feet of him.
                    He beat Jacobs that should get him on your list if Wilder gets on it.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by siablo14 View Post
                      Keep it consistent. Stick to WW. Pacquiao has not fought MW or SM.
                      But Pac started at flyweight. How can it be a cherry pick fighting natural WW who's undefeated young lion?I
                      Floyd should fight Ggg next. Ggg didn't look good. Should be easy for floyd

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP