Is Dillian Whyte suing Boxingscene?

[Toffee]

We should ask how Hauser got the info

100% that will be happening. That's confidential medical information that was leaked.

[PotentialToast]

LMFAO for what, reporting something that was true?

Yeah, that’s allowed. Sorry to inform everyone.

It is breech on confidence, both in the US and the UK. It is clearly actionable. He did not fail a test. He had an adverse analytical finding which was not considered a failed test. UKAD employ the same confidential procedure as WADA.

[PotentialToast]

His feelings that hurt ?

At the loss of a 20M fight.

[PotentialToast]

Did he say that in the interview or something?

He tested positive for Dianabol. If it goes to court then they have power of discovery and he will have to admit that he did test positive for Dianabol....

How the *** did he get cleared? The commission just basically said yeah we believe you that you dont know how you had Dianabol in your system.. what a joke.

He was cleared because he had a clear VADA tesr a couple of days before they found trace amounts. So he could not have taken a the****utic dose and it could unreasonably of only been contamination. Had Whyte not paid for VADA testing, he might have been shafted.

[Ray*]

No he is suing Thomas Hauser and whoever leaked the confidential information to him from the UKAD or laboratory testing facility.

[Citizen Koba]

Is it happening?

For what? He did test positive, I don't think that's ever been disputed. Journo's got a right to journo. If anything he should be putting heat on UKAD or the BBBoC for allowing a leak.

[LacedUp]

LMFAO for what, reporting something that was true?

Yeah, that’s allowed. Sorry to inform everyone.

You don't understand media law.

[W1LL]

Amongst all of the corruption in Boxing, a man pisses dirty and is then cleared of any wrong doing. We are expected to take his word that he is clean and it was not his fault. He gave the same exact speeches the previous time he got caught red-handed and served a ban. He still to this day denies the first time he was juicing, even though it was proven beyond doubt. So who are we to believe? The whole thing stinks.

[Ray*]

We should ask how Hauser got the info

We can’t because it’s confidential. Just like the Whyte case was until Hauser leaked it.

Hauser was the only journalist who took the bait according to my “Sources”.

Loads of journalist were offered the same leakage but some of them refused because they knew about WADA (UKAD) confidential code.

Most of the journalist who were offered the leakage were british doe so maybe they just knew something like this could happen.

The fact that the WBC used that as an excuse to push back Whyte’s mandatory until feb 2021 is what Team Whyte are using as Hauser damaging his career. They are serving him on that basis.

[LacedUp]

For what? He did test positive, I don't think that's ever been disputed. Journo's got a right to journo. If anything he should be putting heat on UKAD or the BBBoC for allowing a leak.

This is not true. He can easily file a lawsuit for defamation if there's been one single article read by more than one person, that even suggests that he's done something illegal.