You can argue that it's a flaw of the Boxrec computers that fighters are still worth a lot of points after they're no longer at their peak, but it has nothing to do with marketing. You're not making any sense. Abraham and DeGale were valuable wins because of Abraham & DeGale's wins, not because of their drawing power.
No, because I don't need to have the same argument with you ten times at the same time. You think fighters should be worth more than they are, the computers disagree. If you have a bone to pick with Boxrec's formula, explain your gripes and make suggestions on how to improve the formula. It doesn't change the fact that Boxrec ratings are far more reflective of what a fighter has proven than sanctioning ratings are.
ANY THOUGHTS ON THE OTHER EXAMPLES?????
Comment