Who has a better resume? Whyte vs Wilder

[LacedUp]

Ortiz is better than everybody on whyte resume including whyte.

What makes Ortiz better than someone like Joseph Parker who has better wins and has done much more in his career than Ortiz?

Fantasy?

[LacedUp]

Wilder because he fought to a draw with Fury and beat Luis Ortiz twice. Both those fighters are better than anyone Whyte has fought, including Joshua.

Ortiz better than Joshua

Alright.

[LacedUp]

3-0-1 (2X wins vs Stiverne, 1X win vs Liahkovich, draw vs Fury)

This sums up Wilder's career.

Mentioning Liakhovic.

yikes.

[LacedUp]

How?

Fury beat Wlad who was unbeaten in a decade.

Beat Chisora twice in much easier fashion than Whyte, and that was a Chisora that was undefeated the first time, and the second time he’d only been beaten by guys like Vitali and Haye. Whyte went life and death a faded Chisora that’d had about 8 losses, 2 of them to Fury. I actually think Chisora beat Whyte the first time.

Fury also really beat Wilder.

Don’t talk nonsense. Fury’s resume isn’t great in terms of depth, but he’s beaten the best guys at the time such as Wlad and Wilder, and made easy work of guys like Chisora.

The version of Chisora that fought Whyte would have completely smashed the version that fought Fury.

Undefeated or not.

[famicommander]

This sums up Wilder's career.

Mentioning Liakhovic.

yikes.

You're the one trying to pretend like the WBA "Regular" Championship is real.

Liakhovich took Ruiz the distance AFTER Wilder blasted him out in one round.

[LacedUp]

You're the one trying to pretend like the WBA "Regular" Championship is real.

Liakhovich took Ruiz the distance AFTER Wilder blasted him out in one round.

The WBA belt is a world championship belt of higher rank than the interim belt .

I didn't make it up, the WBA did. I'm simply stating a fact; but as I reiterated, I don't care about the belts and never have. Someone like Stiverne is still a tomato can even though he was a WBC champion.

And Povetkin is still much better and much more accomplished than Ortiz.

Those are just facts.

[Larry the boss]

The version of Chisora that fought Whyte would have completely smashed the version that fought Fury.

Undefeated or not.

The older more beat up version?? why is that?

[LacedUp]

The older more beat up version?? why is that?

This is a common mistake fans make. To think that the younger version is automatically better. And they make comments when they don't really know much about the fighter.

1) Chisora was 270+ lbs for the first Fury fight and had not trained AT all because Klitschko duped him out of a world title fight.

2) Chisora started boxing very late and had not properly learnt how to turn over his punches and therefore used to slap as opposed to punch.

3) Chisora is a fighter heavily reliant on the atmosphere and dislike for his opponent to fight well; we've seen this in the Kabayel fight and others and against Fury (in the second fight) the atmosphere was flat as the undercard fight Eubank vs Saunders had taken all the excitement of the night.

4) Chisora himself says, as is evident by the fights he currently has smashing people who he previously would have gone rounds with, that he's in his best ever shape.

[ShaneMosleySr]

Ortiz didn’t lose to a fat guy who was unranked with a loss to Parker. Joshua did.

Ortiz better than Joshua

Alright.

[LacedUp]

Ortiz didn’t lose to a fat guy who was unranked with a loss to Parker. Joshua did.

Ortiz lost by KO the only two times he stepped up

Sit down.