Originally posted by LOWBLOW_CHAMP
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Fury's Trainer: Wilder's The Biggest Puncher In Boxing History
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by FlyingFJ View PostStiverne and Brezeale tried it and got exposed. Wilder is too quick for the current Heavyweights. Maybe in couple of years he will slowdown a bit and get exposed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KillaMane26 View PostYeah but imo Wilder had more 1 punch power. Or else Tyson woulda never lost.
You literally cant let Wilder touch you with his right hand lmao.
And Frazier was my guy!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by GelfSara View PostWe will agree to disagree WRT Wilder's punching power; I do give him credit for remaining interested in and dedicated to the sport of boxing--something that was only true of Tyson through 1988.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LoadedWraps View PostFury walks through his best shots and stops him in the rematch. Heard it here first.
Tbh idk who wins, im leaning towads Wilder and thats just cuz of their recent competition
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mindgames View PostWhy when hes only fought two top level heavies? One old one with a chin that cruiserweights dent. Why better than Foreman, young George flattening Frazier and Norton,sending Cooney to sleep, one punching Moorer. Why is the Ortiz win better than these?
Comment
-
Originally posted by whatismyname View PostHe is not better then Foreman, skinny young version of Foreman destroys Wilder. But Wilder is a bigger puncher. Come on msn, everyone has been knocked in one form or another.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Roberto Vasquez View PostWilder's resume really is bad tbh in terms of numbers of fights compared with quality of opponents. So is Tyson Fury's to be fair. Look at Joshua's - he may not turn out to be as good in the end but his record so far is way better for the stage in his career he is at. Even Chisora's is better than Wilders. If both (Fury and Wilder) fighters really are that great - why haven't they fought more top level fighters?
As a boxing fan it's frustrating. This is why you have Wilder fan boys all over the forum trying to convince everyone how great Wilder is. If Wilder fought all comers - the fanboys wouldn't be needed to convince anyone.
My point was even the HOF heavyweights fought a lot of weak opposition. So to say Wilder's resume is weak just sounds like hating and nit picking. He's either fought, re matched or attempted to fight all the best HW's available.
You already have HOF heavyweights like Holyfield vouching for Wilder in saying he could have competed in any era based on his height and his great equalizer alone. He would know.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Realizniguhnit View PostI was talking about Mike Tyson not Tyson Fury. Mike Tyson was considered this killer on his way up then when he stepped up to the cream of the crop and started facing top competition he was taking L's left and right. Ali also fought a lot of cans.
My point was even the HOF heavyweights fought a lot of weak opposition. So to say Wilder's resume is weak just sounds like hating and nit picking. He's either fought, re matched or attempted to fight all the best HW's available.
You already have HOF heavyweights like Holyfield vouching for Wilder in saying he could have competed in any era based on his height and his great equalizer alone. He would know.
As for Ali - he did fight a lot of cans. But he also fought the best at their best. Ali fighting peak Frazier, peak Foreman, peak Liston etc is not comparable to Wilder fighting an old Ortiz twice, an old Stiverne, and a retired Tyson Fury.
Comment
Comment