How hard does Deontay Wilder hit compared to Foreman, Tua, Shavers etc?

[AlexKid]

Its like this except we dont realize we r stabbing, we dont see that dark unconscious side to our interaction we just do it, unknowingly, not knowing what we r really like or really doing

[AlexKid]

deontay is stabbing the fcuk out of Ortiz at the weigh ins and press

[AlexKid]

it feels like just self promotion only, and harmless, but u cant self promote in isolation it involves everyone/others or one going down, as u go up

[AKAcronym]

What the **** are you on about?

[AlexKid]

What the **** are you on about?

how the selfish gene permeates our social interactions and fcuks up our friendships when we know whats going on


Yea back to the question sorry to side track a good thread

[The D3vil]

lets wait until he has actually fought / knocked out credible opponents first before comparing him to HOF'ers and ATG's please.

anyone can KO a load of bums, fat blobs and binman. Its a bit different when your talking about Foreman literally punching Joe Frazier OFF THE GROUND. to getting highlight reel KO's over bums like artur spilka and that fat mess of a man that turned up in the ring in Stirverne 2.

theres no doubt Wilder carries serious power, but he has to prove it agaisnt the best for me before you start saying hes the hardest hitting HW off all time ffs.

Would Foreman, Tua & Shavers go 9 rounds with Eric Molina and Spilka? im gonna say no..

You're talking about his skills.

We're solely talking power.

If he was a better pure boxer, he probably might've actually killed some of those people with the power he has.

And to answer the question, he's has 1 shot power as hard as anybody in history.

He's just lacking in the skill that would allow him to utilize it the best way.

He's still improving though, I'll give him that.

[AlexKid]

its similar to there being no such thing as healthy self esteem which is my theory, its all ego esteem, and its all selfish and destructive to others, (at least in part) the only difference between whats regarded as healthy self esteem and ego esteem is that healthy self esteem doesn't directly fcuk everyone else over it indirectly fcuks them, in a way that the group does not notice, (like working on yourself) you cant have more without others having less in a group dynamic where u r compared to everyone else to get the ego esteem reward!

Whats regarded as unhealthy esteem is being also destructive but direct about it ie arrogant , its less deceptive and amounts to the same thing, you just notice it more and get pissed off more

I suppose there are less damaging more healing ways to get the ego esteem over others, (like how altruistic we r , how we help others in a job that saves/helps people, or by being positive in our psychology etc) where it genuinely is win win and win to them in a big way, but thats not mentioned by psychologists ever, as far as they are concerned as long as you dont directly fcuk people you have healthy self esteem, but most of what we do to get self esteem is just making ourselves more awesome compared to the rest of the sh,it-(other people)

Like self esteem and ego esteem , are the same thing, its nearly always coming from other people at a cost to other people (but there is a tangent where u r taking less and giving more, its just most of what we r into isnt on the giving back part of that tangent, its taking and indirectly fcuking others, to feel good by comparison and psychologists say that is what healthy "self esteem" is)

[AlexKid]

Got to get on with making myself more awesome, cya bros!

[BLASTER1]

:

Got to get on with making myself more awesome, cya bros!

It's all good Alex I will show you some love.
(no-*

[AlexKid]

:

It's all good Alex I will show you some love.
(no-*

no thanks , keep it, you fcuking re,tarded time wasting whale