Carl Froch is a deluded moron. In his head he beats anyone. He was bitter in his prime but now it's getting out of hand. It is on record how he openly didn't want to go near Golovkin when they were both active.
No, Froch never did a job in anyone remotely as good as those two. Frochs best win was Bute, the same guy Golovkin knocked spark out through a head guard years earlier. Funny how stopping Martin Murray in 11 makes you no threat to Froch, since Murray took Groves the distance and George certainly was a threat. Theres no logic in that head of hes.
The same Froch thinks that the Earth is flat because a pencil had 3 miles of graphite and therefore can prove the earth has no curvature......
Carl Froch is a deluded moron. In his head he beats anyone. He was bitter in his prime but now it's getting out of hand. It is on record how he openly didn't want to go near Golovkin when they were both active.
... this is the epitome of this thread: 'Just swerve Golovkin like the plague!'...
... in fact, GGG called him out and Froch just retired...
As a Canadian I can admire that he travelled here to beat our overhyped Bute like a drum. It’s a boxers prerogative to predict victories in mythical matchups. I agree, Froch could put sum damage on a prime ggg even, but would lose. Nelos defence makes him look bad while his flashy fast combos outshine him at the same time. Still I could see Froch survive to lose wide enough on the cards. Nelo is the Pope.
The fight was fought in Nottingham. Bute actually travelled there. If Jacobs could take GGG all the way, so could Froch. And this stat speaks for itself with GGG. When an opponent can hit back, he will go rounds with GGG. Even Lemieux took him to 8 and Murray took him to 11. Froch had a reach and size advantage over him. How many of GGG's fights have you seen that happen in?
Comment