Unless they can defend why other boxer has better resume...
Who's your #3-#10?
In terms of resume no one in this era is currently better as pac has been around for more than 20 years. He has been in 3 diff eras. Unless they can outdo an atg it in just what? 10 years into their careers? Of course not saying they can’t but right now noone is remotely close..
2. Canelo
3-10 is just a mixed of fury, loma, donaire, thurman, spence, crawford etc
Regardless of who you think have better quality wins.
thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins
Originally posted by Boxing1013
Yeah he has about 10+ good wins imo...and 5-6 'great' wins if you want to term it that...great fighter, great career...an ATG at MW...that's pretty clear I think..... If a great win is a dominant win over another prime great fighter...I would say GGG has quite a few tbh..... https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...821123&page=20
thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....
Originally posted by Boxing1013
Canelo's top wins would be Lara..Jacobs and Cotto imo...GGG's would be Jacobs, Murray and Lemieux...I don't see a ton of separation there..... winning 7-5 vs a great Lara...and going 12 with a shot fat Cotto...is not imo better than 8 Round destruction of Lemieux...and 11 round destruction of Murray..... Vanes was inactive and moving up in weight...but he wasn't shot like SSM more or less was..... I don't think going 12 with Mosley when Canelo did, or 12 with Trout, are better wins than GGG running through Monroe and Geale..... https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...820918&page=16
Comment