Comments Thread For: Building The Perfect Canelo as Kovalev Showdown Nears

[Elastic Recoil]

He already is the worlds best fighter only noobs fall for you’re biased agenda that Loma or Crawford two guys who’s resumes look like ****tt compared to canelos are the best. Smh

Utter sheet... Canelo's whole career has been littered with shenanigans from forcing opponents to fight at unfair weights, inflicting rehydration clauses on said opponents (who you're refering to in your resume comment) creating his own fake 155 lbs weight class, systematically targetting aged opponents or those on the slide (Baldomir, Cotto, Jacobs, Mosely 40 years old, Golovkin 35 & 36 and now Kovalev 36! Not to mention the absolutely unforgivable act of using PEDs in a competative dangerous sport. The guy has no morals and is the biggest fraud in the sport of boxing.

Loma and Crawford have made big marks in the sport with their achievments and its all been done by beating the best they could face without taking any easy routes or without cheating therefore they are correctly at 1&2 p4p in most peoples eyes.

[Elastic Recoil]

Ask that arsehole(or Steve Rosenthal/Fitzimmons)about Salido beating Loma & he'll tell you it was because Loma was weight bullied by someone who didn't make weight & they'll say he's been kd by Khanares because hes too lil for 135. Suddenly its only fair to miss agreed upon weight that Jacobs had been doing every prior fight for IBF title when hes facing short ass Nelo. I expect this kind of bs from hypocrite losers on this site but not from professional writers, especially ones that consider themselves knowledgeable worthy of BWAA/Hof inductees etc.

There is zero excuse not to consider Nelo the best fighter in the world atm,& theres zero excuse to consider fighters facing no hopers on top rank shltshows above what Nelos doing which is as ballsy as it gets for someone guaranteed more money than anyone to fight whoever he wants yet still chooses to fight Jacobs then Kovalev back to back.

It's no coincidence that these same few are already preparing excuses in advance as they did before Jacobs in order to justify saying loma/Crawford are #1 because they ko bums like Crolla/peg legavidez as opposed to winning close decisions vs the literal best.(Fitzimmons & Rosenthal made articles immediately after Jacobs fight where they made this literal argument,they said"

lomas #1 because he blasted out crolla spectacularly & even though Nelo schooled Jacobs...blabla..bla..eye test..nelo doesn't ko the literal star name killers he faces, instead winning close fights",yet no mention loma was losing to chinares & had been kd by him before getting a hail Mary ko of a glass chin who had been kod by nobody's & his next fight kod by an uber driver immediately.

To add insult to ******ity Loma couldn't even ko Campbell ffs who nowhere near Jacobs level or size advantage & who demonstrated that when loma stepped up he couldn't make his opponent quit as supposedly was what separated him from nelo

Just shut up! Why would the best fighter in the world EVER feel the need to use PEDs in a competative sport? And dont try and brush it under the carpet like its nothing - its absolutely unforgivable in a dangerous sport & he obviously felt he was lacking something!

[Shadoww702]

Ask that arsehole(or Steve Rosenthal/Fitzimmons)about Salido beating Loma & he'll tell you it was because Loma was weight bullied by someone who didn't make weight & they'll say he's been kd by Khanares because hes too lil for 135. Suddenly its only fair to miss agreed upon weight that Jacobs had been doing every prior fight for IBF title when hes facing short ass Nelo. I expect this kind of bs from hypocrite losers on this site but not from professional writers, especially ones that consider themselves knowledgeable worthy of BWAA/Hof inductees etc.

There is zero excuse not to consider Nelo the best fighter in the world atm,& theres zero excuse to consider fighters facing no hopers on top rank shltshows above what Nelos doing which is as ballsy as it gets for someone guaranteed more money than anyone to fight whoever he wants yet still chooses to fight Jacobs then Kovalev back to back.

It's no coincidence that these same few are already preparing excuses in advance as they did before Jacobs in order to justify saying loma/Crawford are #1 because they ko bums like Crolla/peg legavidez as opposed to winning close decisions vs the literal best.(Fitzimmons & Rosenthal made articles immediately after Jacobs fight where they made this literal argument,they said"

lomas #1 because he blasted out crolla spectacularly & even though Nelo schooled Jacobs...blabla..bla..eye test..nelo doesn't ko the literal star name killers he faces, instead winning close fights",yet no mention loma was losing to chinares & had been kd by him before getting a hail Mary ko of a glass chin who had been kod by nobody's & his next fight kod by an uber driver immediately.

To add insult to ******ity Loma couldn't even ko Campbell ffs who nowhere near Jacobs level or size advantage & who demonstrated that when loma stepped up he couldn't make his opponent quit as supposedly was what separated him from nelo

And yet not one said jack sht about Loma bringing guys up 1-2 weight classes??? I mean even Canelo gave up lbs to help Cotto and Khan out. Just think if Canelo didn’t make that weight???

HYPOCRITE smh

[Shadoww702]

Utter sheet... Canelo's whole career has been littered with shenanigans from forcing opponents to fight at unfair weights, inflicting rehydration clauses on said opponents (who you're refering to in your resume comment) creating his own fake 155 lbs weight class, systematically targetting aged opponents or those on the slide (Baldomir, Cotto, Jacobs, Mosely 40 years old, Golovkin 35 & 36 and now Kovalev 36! Not to mention the absolutely unforgivable act of using PEDs in a competative dangerous sport. The guy has no morals and is the biggest fraud in the sport of boxing.

Loma and Crawford have made big marks in the sport with their achievments and its all been done by beating the best they could face without taking any easy routes or without cheating therefore they are correctly at 1&2 p4p in most peoples eyes.

Blah another pos hypocrite!!! Loma fkn fought guys 2 weight classes smaller you fkn JACK @ss!!!

[Shadoww702]

Just shut up! Why would the best fighter in the world EVER feel the need to use PEDs in a competative sport? And dont try and brush it under the carpet like its nothing - its absolutely unforgivable in a dangerous sport & he obviously felt he was lacking something!

This bi@tch stays Rig. Is bigger than Loma and Rig. Walks around at 145 lmfao

[danktrees]

I dunno man, that Khan ko looked imminent to me from the moment the fight was signed.

[garfios]

This is why Fitzimmons is a hater & no different than when arm chair hacks were saying Cooney was going to beat Holmes & as a result that bs fight is all time highest earning til recently & this is why pac won Fotd despite refusing blood testing to duck.

who doesn't rate CaAnyonenelo as current p4p#1 after his last 3 fights has an agenda as obvious as it gets. Even more obvious when Fitzimmons justified it with Eye test bs after he had been saying for ages the salt was "because Nelo hadn't beaten a prime elite fighter clearly as can be"(Jacobs was the best possible in his prime giant mw champ that had just beaten Derev & Nelo outlanded him 2 to 1 in 8 individual rds", Fitzimmons gave "8 clear rds over a prime bigger elite fighter as a supposed criteria to rate Nelo over Lomas B level wins,then he immediately moved the goalpost right after Nelo schooled Jacobs as usual; just as hes already preparing to do if Nelo finds a way to win let alone by ko).

Boxing has some real salty hater writers that wouldn't sound out of place on this site with these ludricrous arguments to not give the most proven modern fighter his due. I think its because most writers secretly hate Canelo deep down or sometimes because they're loma fanatics that don't wanna admit nelos resume shts all over lomas resume.

I don't rate ginger as a #1 p4p and I don't have an agenda. If you rate his last three fights two of those no matter how you score, are controversial, the other one against a nobody I can't recall his name was a farce. Check every ginger's fight against a good fighter and they are all controversial. You can't be #1 if you need help from judges every time you have a big fight.

[kushking]

I don't rate ginger as a #1 p4p and I don't have an agenda. If you rate his last three fights two of those no matter how you score, are controversial, the other one against a nobody I can't recall his name was a farce. Check every ginger's fight against a good fighter and they are all controversial. You can't be #1 if you need help from judges every time you have a big fight.

They were not controversial & if you think Jacobs had the slightest controversy then Jacobs himself says your fos & hate nelo. Its pitiful that boxing haters act like a midget schooling a giant is unworthy of praise because he didn't bore everyone to death in a 1 sided beatdown like ggg vs bellhops & uber driving house arrest bums

[garfios]

They were not controversial & if you think Jacobs had the slightest controversy then Jacobs himself says your fos & hate nelo. Its pitiful that boxing haters act like a midget schooling a giant is unworthy of praise because he didn't bore everyone to death in a 1 sided beatdown like ggg vs bellhops & uber driving house arrest bums

I gave ou Jacob's, still a close fight, Lara took him to school, xg won the first fight and the 2nd was a toss up, floyd took him to school too, still o e judge saw a draw. Cotton was done just line Mosley's, perro they stopped the fight when he was coming up. The kid is been protected and that is why he hasn't advance. He is the same fighter he was 5 years ago. He is been looking good, he always do, against no hopes. Hood fighters same all thing. I predict if kova took this fight serious. Ginger is in trouble.

[Willy Wanker]