Originally posted by Cigar
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Lomachenko Named WBC "Franchise" Champ, Haney Upgraded To Full
Collapse
-
-
This franchise stuff is all bullshit.
It's like the alphabet organisations are just trolling boxing fans now.
Comment
-
I'd like to see guys promoted to champion this way drop the belt in the trash.
That's what it's going to take.
The belt is worthless right now. You don't even have to win it.
Add WBC to WBA. Two fewer orgs to worry about.
Comment
-
this is the wbc being greedy by creating another bogus belt. more sanctioning fees for the wbc. wbc is the worst.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostThis means Loma and Canelo are the true WBC champs while Haney and Charlo are now the WBA Regular champs. WBA started this nonsense when they created 2 belts elevating the WBA Super champ status above the WBA Regular champ. Now WBC following. It sucks but the WBC Franchise = WBA Super and WBC Regular = WBA Regular.
If Loma beats the IBF champ next he will still be undisputed just like many fighters have become undisputed while being WBA Super champ and not fighting the secondary WBA Regular champ.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=TarasMarcenko;20141379]Originally posted by Theosis26 View Post
Haney has been calling Loma out for two months and it seems like 100x but that's impossible. He only started after Loma fought Campbell. You can't bring up even 20 disparate times, but every week for the past 50 days yes he's been very vocal if not childish. Name calling is young teenage crap, not professional calibre behavior. Loma has been in comparison calling out Tank for two years but it's professionally handled. He had even offered to fight Tank for free to show that they shouldn't let two different promoters get in the way. I'm sure Arum wasn't happy with Loma's statement. Nor were the other getting 3% of the purse. Two years he called him out and he already had a few belts to lose. A true champion at heart. He wanted to test his mettle against the man they call Tank. I still think Tank is unproven. If he beats Haney or Teo or Loma, well then. Will Haney continue to call out Loma now that Loma is whatever the **** lineal is? That's the true test of Haney's mettle. Risk his belt. No big prize at the end of that thread, or is there? I can't begin to understand the ramifications for Loma's other two belts and potential 3rd or 4th, whichever it is. Loma should fight Tank after Comment/Teo fight in my opinion. That's priority over Haney. But if Tank continues ****ing it out let's see what happens. I'm tired of Loma in fights with opponents dwarfing him. He was funner to watch at his natural weight and fighters his size or just a little bigger. The only fighter smaller than him really was Rigo. And on paper that was called by Roy Jones as best fight in history of boxing. Next to Shakur he is still the smaller fighter. I'd like to see him take on the four belt holders at 130 and when Shakur moves up to meet there. Haney by sheer size can cause serious damage to Loma. Haney is a 147 pound fighter waiting to happen. Loma could go back down to 126 and still be fighting opponents same size or larger. Remember Rigo called out Loma heavy for that fight and after Loma just said, 'I take no credit for that, he was too small'. You think Haney would say the same thing if he beats Loma? Or boxing 24? Most pundants still think Loma is too skilled for Haney. I don't know. Haney's the real deal. Haney made a dumb remark though. He said he could beat everyone Loma has beat. But Haney could never go down to 126 to fight Gary Russell or the Ax man, actually that might have been 130. That's like Tyson saying he could have beaten everyone that Mayweather beat. And?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRgeP1LGPa0
Try again..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jubei View PostThis has to be a goddamn joke, people are getting belts for doing nothing and then you have franchise champions left and right so the WBC can get more money from sanctiong fees? What has Haney done to become a champion? Just as much as Charlo. Nothing.
Comment
Comment